James Trotter vs Nathan Ponwith — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Trotter J.
6-3 7-6
Ponwith N.
Trotter J.
6772
Ponwith N.
3610

James Trotter defeated Nathan Ponwith 6-3 7-6 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: James Trotter closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Trotter J.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Serve advantage — Trotter J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trotter J.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
3.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (160 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trotter J.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 238 days (−1.5)
Ponwith N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trotter J.Ponwith N.
Freshness·
75
—

Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Galarneau A.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[7]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Sekulic P.
Trotter J.
6-42-67-63
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Boulais J.
6-36-2
Galarneau A.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-3
Trotter J.
Mccabe J.
7-686-2
R16
Trotter J.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
7-652-0
Schoolkate T.
Cazaux A.[2]
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Kudla D.[5]
7-56-3
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-36-4
Boulais J.
Lajal M.
6-41-67-65
Galarneau A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-27-66
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Janvier M.
Walton A.
6-44-67-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Uchiyama Y.
6-767-646-1
Kudla D.[5]
Moriya H.
6-45-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.[2]
Ly N.
6-17-67
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-777-616-1
Janvier M.
Jung J.
7-666-3
Mccabe J.
Sandgren T.
7-646-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-766-4
Trotter J.
Ponwith N.
6-37-61
Harrison C.
Cozbinov A.
6-16-3
Schoolkate T.
Sheehy J.
6-26-3
Boulais J.
Bicknell B.
6-04-66-4
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-06-2
Lajal M.
Shang J.[3]
6-26-2
Sweeny D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
3-66-46-4
Galarneau A.[7]
Jasika O.
6-13-66-3