Rudolf Molleker vs Gauthier Onclin — Amersfoort CH Quarter-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Rudolf Molleker
GER
Rudolf Molleker
#484ATP
1387ELO
1382Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Gauthier Onclin
BEL
Gauthier Onclin
#178ATP
1567ELO
1496Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$616kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWL
Molleker R.
6-2 6-2
Onclin G.
Molleker R.
662
Onclin G.
220

Rudolf Molleker defeated Gauthier Onclin 6-2 6-2 in the Amersfoort CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Molleker R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Onclin G.

Onclin G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Molleker R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Molleker R.Onclin G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Molleker R.Onclin G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
79
Break points won·Slight edge
12
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Molleker R.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Onclin G.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1382
Surface ELO
6.8+115 Clay Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1387
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1567
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
4.1
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Molleker R.Onclin G.
Freshness·Slight edge
73
68

Molleker R.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Onclin G.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.[5]
Droguet T.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Droguet T.[8]
Erhard M.
7-56-1
Marterer M.[5]
Molleker R.
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[8]
Deckers A.
6-34-66-3
Erhard M.
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
6-30-0
Molleker R.
Onclin G.
6-26-2
R16
Droguet T.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-4
Onclin G.
Den Ouden G.
7-667-66
Deckers A.
Choinski J.[3]
6-27-65
Marterer M.[5]
Mensik J.
6-37-63
Geerts M.
De Loore J.
7-626-746-4
Molleker R.
Delbonis F.
6-16-3
Erhard M.
Ionel N.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-34-66-4
R32
Erhard M.
Colson T.
7-667-63
Geerts M.
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
3-66-26-2
Mensik J.
Guinard M.
6-26-2
Marterer M.[5]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Den Ouden G.
De Jong J.[6]
6-43-66-3
Choinski J.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-2
De Loore J.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Delbonis F.
Sels J.[4]
7-626-2
Molleker R.
Jong S.
6-47-63
Droguet T.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-4
Moller E.
Visker N.
6-26-1
Deckers A.
Landaluce M.
7-647-5
Ionel N.[7]
Houkes M.
7-646-2
Travaglia S.
Potenza L.
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-16-2