Mark Lajal vs Juncheng Shang — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
EST
Mark Lajal
#159ATP
1589ELO
1556Hard ELO
$97kYTD
$654kCAREER
23 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
CHN3
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Lajal M.
6-2 6-2
Shang J.
Lajal M.
662
Shang J.
220

Mark Lajal defeated Juncheng Shang 6-2 6-2 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lajal M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lajal M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Lajal M.Shang J.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
18

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Lajal M.Shang J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lajal M.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
96
Break points won·Dominant
13
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
81
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lajal M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Shang J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.0Hard Elo 1556
Surface ELO
7.0+142 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1589
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1746
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
4.8
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Lajal M.Shang J.
Freshness·
88
—

Lajal M.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Galarneau A.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[7]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Sekulic P.
Trotter J.
6-42-67-63
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Boulais J.
6-36-2
Galarneau A.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-3
Trotter J.
Mccabe J.
7-686-2
R16
Trotter J.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
7-652-0
Schoolkate T.
Cazaux A.[2]
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Kudla D.[5]
7-56-3
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-36-4
Boulais J.
Lajal M.
6-41-67-65
Galarneau A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-27-66
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Janvier M.
Walton A.
6-44-67-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Uchiyama Y.
6-767-646-1
Kudla D.[5]
Moriya H.
6-45-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.[2]
Ly N.
6-17-67
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-777-616-1
Janvier M.
Jung J.
7-666-3
Mccabe J.
Sandgren T.
7-646-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-766-4
Trotter J.
Ponwith N.
6-37-61
Harrison C.
Cozbinov A.
6-16-3
Schoolkate T.
Sheehy J.
6-26-3
Boulais J.
Bicknell B.
6-04-66-4
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-06-2
Lajal M.
Shang J.[3]
6-26-2
Sweeny D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
3-66-46-4
Galarneau A.[7]
Jasika O.
6-13-66-3