Kaja Juvan vs Astra Sharma — Budapest Round of 16

Budapest · WTA · Round of 16
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#127WTA
1696ELO
1685Clay ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
AUS
Astra Sharma
#589WTA
1512ELO
1496Clay ELO
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Juvan K.
6-2 4-6 6-2
Sharma A.
Juvan K.
6462
Sharma A.
2621

Kaja Juvan defeated Astra Sharma 6-2 4-6 6-2 in the Budapest round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Kaja Juvan came in ranked #127.

Key context

  • Match story: Kaja Juvan closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Juvan K.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sharma A.

Sharma A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Serve advantage — Juvan K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Juvan K.Sharma A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
45%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Juvan K.Sharma A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
27
Break points saved·Even
56
58
Break points won·Dominant
95
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
33
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
33
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Juvan K.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Sharma A.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 168 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.6+189 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1496
7.6Overall Elo 1696
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1512
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Timofeeva M.
Baindl K.
6-33-66-0
Semi-finals
Timofeeva M.
Podoroska N.[9]
7-663-66-3
Baindl K.
Liu C.
7-57-63
Quarter-finals
Podoroska N.[9]
Avanesyan E.[6]
6-16-3
Timofeeva M.
Juvan K.
3-66-36-2
Baindl K.
Stollar F.
7-656-3
Liu C.
Schmiedlova A.[8]
7-56-4
R16
Timofeeva M.
Shnaider D.
6-16-1
Baindl K.
Toth A.
6-36-1
Avanesyan E.[6]
Bondar A.
6-36-0
Stollar F.
Maria T.[5]
6-32-67-66
Juvan K.
Sharma A.
6-24-66-2
Liu C.
Putintseva Y.[4]
6-37-68
Podoroska N.[9]
Siskova A.
6-36-0
Schmiedlova A.[8]
Korpatsch T.
4-66-26-3
R32
Toth A.
Zhang S.[2]
7-5
Schmiedlova A.[8]
Kudermetova P.
6-26-0
Baindl K.
Szabanin N.
6-47-5
Juvan K.
Kucova K.
7-56-2
Siskova A.
Rodina E.
6-36-0
Putintseva Y.[4]
Bondarenko K.
1-66-26-1
Timofeeva M.
Saville D.
2-66-36-4
Shnaider D.
Pera B.[1]
6-47-5
Sharma A.
Rakhimova K.[7]
6-36-3
Podoroska N.[9]
Hunter S.
1-66-16-1
Bondar A.
Babos T.
7-55-76-3
Avanesyan E.[6]
Sramkova R.
2-66-46-3
Korpatsch T.
Grammatikopoulou V.
6-46-4
Liu C.
Chirico L.
6-46-4
Stollar F.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
7-56-4
Maria T.[5]
Monnet C.
3-67-656-2