Guy Den Ouden vs Jesper De Jong — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Guy Den Ouden
#244ATP
1495ELO
1484Clay ELO
$84kYTD
$332kCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Jesper De Jong
NED6
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Den Ouden G.
6-4 3-6 6-3
De Jong J.
Den Ouden G.
6362
De Jong J.
4631

Guy Den Ouden defeated Jesper De Jong 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

  • Match story: Guy Den Ouden closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Den Ouden G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Den Ouden G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Den Ouden G.De Jong J.
—
Serve
49
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Den Ouden G.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.6
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (107 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Den Ouden G.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
56
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
90
Break points won·Even
36
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
69
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Den Ouden G.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 476 days (−1.5)
De Jong J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.0Clay Elo 1484
Surface ELO
7.0+211 Clay Elo edge
2.8Overall Elo 1495
ELO gap
7.2Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Den Ouden G.De Jong J.
Freshness·Clear edge
69
88

Den Ouden G.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d) · De Jong J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.[5]
Droguet T.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Droguet T.[8]
Erhard M.
7-56-1
Marterer M.[5]
Molleker R.
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[8]
Deckers A.
6-34-66-3
Erhard M.
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
6-30-0
Molleker R.
Onclin G.
6-26-2
R16
Droguet T.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-4
Onclin G.
Den Ouden G.
7-667-66
Deckers A.
Choinski J.[3]
6-27-65
Marterer M.[5]
Mensik J.
6-37-63
Geerts M.
De Loore J.
7-626-746-4
Molleker R.
Delbonis F.
6-16-3
Erhard M.
Ionel N.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-34-66-4
R32
Erhard M.
Colson T.
7-667-63
Geerts M.
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
3-66-26-2
Mensik J.
Guinard M.
6-26-2
Marterer M.[5]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Den Ouden G.
De Jong J.[6]
6-43-66-3
Choinski J.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-2
De Loore J.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Delbonis F.
Sels J.[4]
7-626-2
Molleker R.
Jong S.
6-47-63
Droguet T.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-4
Moller E.
Visker N.
6-26-1
Deckers A.
Landaluce M.
7-647-5
Ionel N.[7]
Houkes M.
7-646-2
Travaglia S.
Potenza L.
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-16-2