Rudolf Molleker vs Sander Jong — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Rudolf Molleker
GER
Rudolf Molleker
#482ATP
1387ELO
1382Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
NED
Sander Jong
#730ATP
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWLW
Molleker R.
6-4 7-6
Jong S.
Molleker R.
6772
Jong S.
4630

Rudolf Molleker defeated Sander Jong 6-4 7-6 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Molleker R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jong S.

Jong S.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Molleker R.

Serve advantage — Jong S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Molleker R.Jong S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
10.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Molleker R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jong S.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 371 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Molleker R.Jong S.
Freshness·Even
66
68

Molleker R.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 60 games (7d) · Jong S.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.[5]
Droguet T.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Droguet T.[8]
Erhard M.
7-56-1
Marterer M.[5]
Molleker R.
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[8]
Deckers A.
6-34-66-3
Erhard M.
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
6-30-0
Molleker R.
Onclin G.
6-26-2
R16
Droguet T.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-4
Onclin G.
Den Ouden G.
7-667-66
Deckers A.
Choinski J.[3]
6-27-65
Marterer M.[5]
Mensik J.
6-37-63
Geerts M.
De Loore J.
7-626-746-4
Molleker R.
Delbonis F.
6-16-3
Erhard M.
Ionel N.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-34-66-4
R32
Erhard M.
Colson T.
7-667-63
Geerts M.
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
3-66-26-2
Mensik J.
Guinard M.
6-26-2
Marterer M.[5]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Den Ouden G.
De Jong J.[6]
6-43-66-3
Choinski J.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-2
De Loore J.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Delbonis F.
Sels J.[4]
7-626-2
Molleker R.
Jong S.
6-47-63
Droguet T.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-4
Moller E.
Visker N.
6-26-1
Deckers A.
Landaluce M.
7-647-5
Ionel N.[7]
Houkes M.
7-646-2
Travaglia S.
Potenza L.
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-16-2