Tung Lin Wu vs Maxime Janvier — Granby CH Quarter-final

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
Maxime Janvier
FRA
Maxime Janvier
#566ATP
1297ELO
1282Hard ELO
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Wu T.
6-4 6-4
Janvier M.
Wu T.
662
Janvier M.
440

Tung Lin Wu defeated Maxime Janvier 6-4 6-4 in the Granby CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Janvier M.

Janvier M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Janvier M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
5.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Janvier M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
5
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
71
Break points won·Slight edge
6
1
Deciding sets·Even
6
7
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
4
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Janvier M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+94 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1282
6.5Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1297
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Janvier M.
Freshness·Even
80
83

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Janvier M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Galarneau A.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[7]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Sekulic P.
Trotter J.
6-42-67-63
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Boulais J.
6-36-2
Galarneau A.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-3
Trotter J.
Mccabe J.
7-686-2
R16
Trotter J.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
7-652-0
Schoolkate T.
Cazaux A.[2]
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Kudla D.[5]
7-56-3
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-36-4
Boulais J.
Lajal M.
6-41-67-65
Galarneau A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-27-66
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Janvier M.
Walton A.
6-44-67-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Uchiyama Y.
6-767-646-1
Kudla D.[5]
Moriya H.
6-45-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.[2]
Ly N.
6-17-67
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-777-616-1
Janvier M.
Jung J.
7-666-3
Mccabe J.
Sandgren T.
7-646-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-766-4
Trotter J.
Ponwith N.
6-37-61
Harrison C.
Cozbinov A.
6-16-3
Schoolkate T.
Sheehy J.
6-26-3
Boulais J.
Bicknell B.
6-04-66-4
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-06-2
Lajal M.
Shang J.[3]
6-26-2
Sweeny D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
3-66-46-4
Galarneau A.[7]
Jasika O.
6-13-66-3