Cem Ilkel vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras — Pozoblanco CH Round of 32

Pozoblanco CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR8
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
ESP
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Ilkel C.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Menendez Maceiras A.
Ilkel C.
646772
Menendez Maceiras A.
774621

Cem Ilkel defeated Adrian Menendez Maceiras 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Pozoblanco CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Adrian Menendez Maceiras came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Menendez Maceiras A.
1st serve in·
58%
—
1st serve points won·
71%
—
2nd serve points won·
50%
—
Service points won·
62%
—
Return points won·
37%
—
Break points saved·
56%
—
Aces / match·
4.6
—
Double faults / match·
2.3
—

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window. ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Menendez Maceiras A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
21
Break points saved·Slight edge
49
54
Break points won·Even
3
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
66
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ilkel C.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Menendez Maceiras A.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 287 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[1]
Ficovich J.
6-746-27-63
Semi-finals
Grenier H.[1]
Moro Canas A.
6-43-66-1
Ficovich J.
Atmane T.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Ficovich J.
Cukierman D.
6-23-67-5
Moro Canas A.
Added D.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Butvilas E.
3-67-626-4
Grenier H.[1]
Escoffier A.[6]
6-46-3
R16
Added D.
Bellucci M.[3]
7-647-66
Atmane T.
Berankis R.[7]
7-626-3
Grenier H.[1]
Kachmazov A.
7-626-3
Ficovich J.
Ilkel C.[8]
6-46-756-3
Butvilas E.
Nava E.[4]
6-36-4
Moro Canas A.
Llamas Ruiz P.[5]
6-13-67-5
Cukierman D.
Erel Y.
6-31-66-2
Escoffier A.[6]
Masur D.
6-46-4
R32
Ilkel C.[8]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-746-47-62
Kachmazov A.
Lock B.
7-617-5
Butvilas E.
Giustino L.
6-16-2
Atmane T.
Vives Marcos P.
7-627-60
Erel Y.
Peliwo F.
6-16-1
Nava E.[4]
Montes De La Torre I.
6-36-2
Berankis R.[7]
Marie J.
6-46-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[5]
Verdasco F.
6-27-60
Masur D.
Mejia N.
6-37-65
Escoffier A.[6]
Palan D.
6-46-4
Added D.
Bellier A.
6-756-47-66
Cukierman D.
Moreno De Alboran N.[2]
6-47-66
Bellucci M.[3]
Wessels L.
7-646-3
Moro Canas A.
Barroso Campos A.
6-46-786-3
Ficovich J.
Peniston R.
3-67-606-3
Grenier H.[1]
Herbert P.
6-33-66-4