Matteo Gigante vs Clement Tabur — Trieste CH Round of 32

Trieste CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
Gigante M.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Tabur C.
Gigante M.
66562
Tabur C.
47731

Matteo Gigante defeated Clement Tabur 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Trieste CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Gigante closed it out in three sets, 6–4 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Tabur C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Tabur C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Tabur C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
32
Break points saved·Even
78
74
Break points won·Clear edge
35
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
40
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
54
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Tabur C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.8+45 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1553
4.8Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1607
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.6
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.3
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gigante M.Tabur C.
Freshness·
—
55

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gaston H.[4]
Passaro F.[6]
6-35-76-2
Semi-finals
Gaston H.[4]
Martinez P.[2]
6-33-66-2
Passaro F.[6]
Marozsan F.[1]
3-67-56-2
Quarter-finals
Gaston H.[4]
Jacquet K.
4-66-46-4
Passaro F.[6]
Andreozzi G.
3-66-16-4
Martinez P.[2]
Napolitano S.
6-26-4
Marozsan F.[1]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-4
R16
Jacquet K.
Sachko V.
6-36-4
Marozsan F.[1]
Gigante M.
7-643-67-5
Dalla Valle E.
Cobolli F.[7]
7-656-1
Napolitano S.
Kolar Z.[8]
4-67-647-60
Gaston H.[4]
Burruchaga R.
6-34-66-0
Passaro F.[6]
Prizmic D.
4-66-46-2
Andreozzi G.
Andreev A.
6-37-65
Martinez P.[2]
Serafini M.
6-37-5
R32
Cobolli F.[7]
Pellegrino A.
6-47-5
Jacquet K.
Taberner C.
6-37-69
Dalla Valle E.
Tseng C.
4-67-637-67
Prizmic D.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Burruchaga R.
Chepelev A.
6-21-66-4
Martinez P.[2]
Gojowczyk P.
6-16-3
Serafini M.
Sanchez Jover C.
7-51-67-63
Napolitano S.
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Kolar Z.[8]
Piraino G.
7-652-66-3
Sachko V.
Neumayer L.
6-44-66-4
Passaro F.[6]
Darderi L.
6-46-4
Andreev A.
Bourgue M.
6-46-2
Andreozzi G.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
7-56-2
Gigante M.
Tabur C.
6-46-756-3
Marozsan F.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-27-63
Gaston H.[4]
Caruso S.
6-16-0