Vit Kopriva vs Giovanni Fonio — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Vit Kopriva
CZE
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1699Clay ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1319Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Kopriva V.
6-4 7-6
Fonio G.
Kopriva V.
6782
Fonio G.
4660

Vit Kopriva defeated Giovanni Fonio 6-4 7-6 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Vit Kopriva came in ranked #64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kopriva V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Fonio G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Kopriva V.Fonio G.
20
Serve
—
56
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kopriva V.Fonio G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kopriva V.Fonio G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
6
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
63
Break points won·Dominant
66
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kopriva V.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Fonio G.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0+380 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1319
9.9Overall Elo 1740
ELO gap
0.1Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.7
Surface form
4.9
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
7.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kopriva V.Fonio G.
Freshness·
97
—

Kopriva V.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Svrcina D.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Rincon D.
4-66-36-2
Svrcina D.[5]
Squire H.
7-666-1
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Dougaz A.
6-36-3
Rincon D.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Michalski D.
7-51-66-3
Svrcina D.[5]
Klein L.[3]
7-656-1
R16
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.[4]
7-56-4
Michalski D.
Bonadio R.[6]
7-55-6
Dougaz A.
Garin C.[2]
6-24-0
Svrcina D.[5]
Casanova H.
7-57-65
Squire H.
Piros Z.[1]
6-736-46-1
Klein L.[3]
Kopriva V.
7-56-1
Nagal S.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-727-64
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-17-65
R32
Nagal S.[7]
Vesely J.
6-46-1
Bonadio R.[6]
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Lavagno E.[8]
6-46-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Hassan B.
5-76-46-3
Svrcina D.[5]
Jianu F.
3-66-36-3
Garin C.[2]
Serdarusic N.
1-66-36-2
Kopriva V.
Fonio G.
6-47-66
Ajdukovic D.
Vacherot V.
1-67-666-2
Casanova H.
Bertola R.
4-66-36-0
Coppejans K.[4]
Kirkin E.
3-67-56-2
Piros Z.[1]
Echargui M.
6-47-65
Rincon D.
Rottoli L.
6-23-67-5
Klein L.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-36-4
Squire H.
Kodat T.
3-67-56-0
Michalski D.
Kaukovalta P.
6-37-63
Dougaz A.
Zekic M.
6-26-4