Mathys Erhard vs Stijn Slump — Amersfoort CH Qualifying Round 1

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
FRA5
Mathys Erhard
#357ATP
1382ELO
1351Clay ELO
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
NED
Stijn Slump
#928ATP
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
Erhard M.
6-2 6-4
Slump S.
Erhard M.
662
Slump S.
240

Mathys Erhard defeated Stijn Slump 6-2 6-4 in the Amersfoort CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Erhard M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Slump S.

Slump S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Erhard M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Erhard M.Slump S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
54%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Erhard M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Slump S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Erhard M.Slump S.
Freshness·
85
—

Erhard M.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Visker N.
Nijboer R.
7-653-67-5
Erhard M.[5]
Potenza L.[10]
6-16-2
Moller E.[8]
Marti Pujolras A.[4]
6-26-1
Vrbensky M.[3]
Beaupain S.[11]
6-42-67-64
Colson T.
Klok D.
6-46-2
De Loore J.[1]
Braynin A.
6-17-5
Q1
Nijboer R.
Milev Y.[13]
6-06-3
De Loore J.[1]
Wassermann D.
7-696-4
Erhard M.[5]
Slump S.
6-26-4
Moller E.[8]
Pontjodikromo S.
6-37-63
Klok D.
Habib H.[7]
3-67-56-1
Colson T.
Rehberg M.[6]
3-67-656-4
Potenza L.[10]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-726-1
Marti Pujolras A.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-47-62
Beaupain S.[11]
Van Sambeek F.
6-46-2
Vrbensky M.[3]
Mora M.
6-36-4
Visker N.
Ribeiro E.[2]
6-37-613
Braynin A.
Pereira J.[9]
6-36-4