Blake Ellis vs Ajeet Rai — Granby CH Qualifying Round 1

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
NZL9
Ajeet Rai
#992ATP
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Ellis B.
5-7 6-4 7-5
Rai A.
Ellis B.
5672
Rai A.
7451

Blake Ellis defeated Ajeet Rai 5-7 6-4 7-5 in the Granby CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ellis B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Rai A.

Rai A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Serve advantage — Ellis B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ellis B.Rai A.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.9
6.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 56). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ellis B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rai A.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
2.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ellis B.Rai A.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
85

Ellis B.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Rai A.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 24 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Kypson P.[1]
Ponwith N.[7]
6-37-5
Sheehy J.
Markes C.
6-26-727-5
Sekulic P.[11]
Sinclair C.[5]
6-36-4
Trotter J.
Clark E.[12]
7-56-4
Bicknell B.
Ellis B.
6-16-0
Chappell N.[4]
Cozbinov A.[10]
7-640-67-61
Q1
Clark E.[12]
Weekes J.
7-52-67-5
Kypson P.[1]
Mccormick T.
7-656-2
Ponwith N.[7]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Cozbinov A.[10]
Martin D.
1-66-46-1
Ellis B.
Rai A.[9]
5-76-47-5
Sheehy J.
Puttergill C.
6-47-60
Bicknell B.
Langmo C.[3]
6-17-68
Sinclair C.[5]
Damm M.
6-747-686-3
Trotter J.
Kirchheimer S.[6]
7-656-4
Sekulic P.[11]
Perez A.
6-36-4
Markes C.
Escobedo E.[8]
6-16-3
Kypson P.
Mccormick T.
7-656-2
Chappell N.[4]
Rice K.
6-16-3