Lukas Klein vs Elmar Ejupovic — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lukas Klein
SVK3
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Klein L.
6-3 6-4
Ejupovic E.
Klein L.
662
Ejupovic E.
340

Lukas Klein defeated Elmar Ejupovic 6-3 6-4 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Klein closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Klein L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Ejupovic E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Klein L.Ejupovic E.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 82). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Klein L.Ejupovic E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
39
7
Break points saved·Even
92
88
Break points won·Even
1
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Klein L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ejupovic E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Svrcina D.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Rincon D.
4-66-36-2
Svrcina D.[5]
Squire H.
7-666-1
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Dougaz A.
6-36-3
Rincon D.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Michalski D.
7-51-66-3
Svrcina D.[5]
Klein L.[3]
7-656-1
R16
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.[4]
7-56-4
Michalski D.
Bonadio R.[6]
7-55-6
Dougaz A.
Garin C.[2]
6-24-0
Svrcina D.[5]
Casanova H.
7-57-65
Squire H.
Piros Z.[1]
6-736-46-1
Klein L.[3]
Kopriva V.
7-56-1
Nagal S.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-727-64
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-17-65
R32
Nagal S.[7]
Vesely J.
6-46-1
Bonadio R.[6]
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Lavagno E.[8]
6-46-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Hassan B.
5-76-46-3
Svrcina D.[5]
Jianu F.
3-66-36-3
Garin C.[2]
Serdarusic N.
1-66-36-2
Kopriva V.
Fonio G.
6-47-66
Ajdukovic D.
Vacherot V.
1-67-666-2
Casanova H.
Bertola R.
4-66-36-0
Coppejans K.[4]
Kirkin E.
3-67-56-2
Piros Z.[1]
Echargui M.
6-47-65
Rincon D.
Rottoli L.
6-23-67-5
Klein L.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-36-4
Squire H.
Kodat T.
3-67-56-0
Michalski D.
Kaukovalta P.
6-37-63
Dougaz A.
Zekic M.
6-26-4