Zsombor Piros vs Moez Echargui — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Piros Z.
6-4 7-6
Echargui M.
Piros Z.
6772
Echargui M.
4650

Zsombor Piros defeated Moez Echargui 6-4 7-6 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
4
Break points saved·Dominant
84
48
Break points won·Clear edge
32
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Echargui M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+278 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1342
7.7Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1416
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.1
Minutes 14d
7.1
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Echargui M.
Freshness·Dominant
54
100

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Echargui M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[7]
Svrcina D.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Rincon D.
4-66-36-2
Svrcina D.[5]
Squire H.
7-666-1
Quarter-finals
Nagal S.[7]
Dougaz A.
6-36-3
Rincon D.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-1
Squire H.
Michalski D.
7-51-66-3
Svrcina D.[5]
Klein L.[3]
7-656-1
R16
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.[4]
7-56-4
Michalski D.
Bonadio R.[6]
7-55-6
Dougaz A.
Garin C.[2]
6-24-0
Svrcina D.[5]
Casanova H.
7-57-65
Squire H.
Piros Z.[1]
6-736-46-1
Klein L.[3]
Kopriva V.
7-56-1
Nagal S.[7]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-36-727-64
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-17-65
R32
Nagal S.[7]
Vesely J.
6-46-1
Bonadio R.[6]
Kasnikowski M.
6-46-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Lavagno E.[8]
6-46-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Hassan B.
5-76-46-3
Svrcina D.[5]
Jianu F.
3-66-36-3
Garin C.[2]
Serdarusic N.
1-66-36-2
Kopriva V.
Fonio G.
6-47-66
Ajdukovic D.
Vacherot V.
1-67-666-2
Casanova H.
Bertola R.
4-66-36-0
Coppejans K.[4]
Kirkin E.
3-67-56-2
Piros Z.[1]
Echargui M.
6-47-65
Rincon D.
Rottoli L.
6-23-67-5
Klein L.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-36-4
Squire H.
Kodat T.
3-67-56-0
Michalski D.
Kaukovalta P.
6-37-63
Dougaz A.
Zekic M.
6-26-4