Jan Choinski vs Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna — Amersfoort CH Round of 32

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jan Choinski
GBR3
Jan Choinski
#100ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
ARG
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
1331ELO
1322Clay ELO
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Choinski J.
6-4 7-5
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Choinski J.
672
Rodriguez Taverna S.
450

Jan Choinski defeated Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna 6-4 7-5 in the Amersfoort CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Choinski J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Rodriguez Taverna S.

Rodriguez Taverna S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Serve advantage — Choinski J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Choinski J.Rodriguez Taverna S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Choinski J.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
55
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
72
Break points won·Clear edge
20
4
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
76
Tiebreaks·Even
41
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Choinski J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Rodriguez Taverna S.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+331 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1322
8.1Overall Elo 1686
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
5.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.0
Minutes 14d
8.7
0.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Choinski J.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Freshness·Clear edge
60
72

Choinski J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d) · Rodriguez Taverna S.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.[5]
Droguet T.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Droguet T.[8]
Erhard M.
7-56-1
Marterer M.[5]
Molleker R.
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[8]
Deckers A.
6-34-66-3
Erhard M.
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
6-30-0
Molleker R.
Onclin G.
6-26-2
R16
Droguet T.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-4
Onclin G.
Den Ouden G.
7-667-66
Deckers A.
Choinski J.[3]
6-27-65
Marterer M.[5]
Mensik J.
6-37-63
Geerts M.
De Loore J.
7-626-746-4
Molleker R.
Delbonis F.
6-16-3
Erhard M.
Ionel N.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-34-66-4
R32
Erhard M.
Colson T.
7-667-63
Geerts M.
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
3-66-26-2
Mensik J.
Guinard M.
6-26-2
Marterer M.[5]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Den Ouden G.
De Jong J.[6]
6-43-66-3
Choinski J.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-2
De Loore J.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Delbonis F.
Sels J.[4]
7-626-2
Molleker R.
Jong S.
6-47-63
Droguet T.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-4
Moller E.
Visker N.
6-26-1
Deckers A.
Landaluce M.
7-647-5
Ionel N.[7]
Houkes M.
7-646-2
Travaglia S.
Potenza L.
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-16-2