Arthur Cazaux vs Nam Hoang Ly — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA2
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Cazaux A.
6-1 7-6
Ly N.
Cazaux A.
6792
Ly N.
1670

Arthur Cazaux defeated Nam Hoang Ly 6-1 7-6 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Ly N.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Ly N.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Ly N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
66%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ly N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.3
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Galarneau A.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[7]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Sekulic P.
Trotter J.
6-42-67-63
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Boulais J.
6-36-2
Galarneau A.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-3
Trotter J.
Mccabe J.
7-686-2
R16
Trotter J.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
7-652-0
Schoolkate T.
Cazaux A.[2]
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Kudla D.[5]
7-56-3
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-36-4
Boulais J.
Lajal M.
6-41-67-65
Galarneau A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-27-66
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Janvier M.
Walton A.
6-44-67-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Uchiyama Y.
6-767-646-1
Kudla D.[5]
Moriya H.
6-45-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.[2]
Ly N.
6-17-67
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-777-616-1
Janvier M.
Jung J.
7-666-3
Mccabe J.
Sandgren T.
7-646-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-766-4
Trotter J.
Ponwith N.
6-37-61
Harrison C.
Cozbinov A.
6-16-3
Schoolkate T.
Sheehy J.
6-26-3
Boulais J.
Bicknell B.
6-04-66-4
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-06-2
Lajal M.
Shang J.[3]
6-26-2
Sweeny D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
3-66-46-4
Galarneau A.[7]
Jasika O.
6-13-66-3