Blaise Bicknell vs Christian Langmo — Granby CH Qualifying Round 1

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JAM
Blaise Bicknell
#354ATP
1313ELO
1290Hard ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
Christian Langmo
USA3
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWWLLW
Bicknell B.
6-1 7-6
Langmo C.
Bicknell B.
67102
Langmo C.
1680

Blaise Bicknell defeated Christian Langmo 6-1 7-6 in the Granby CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Blaise Bicknell came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bicknell B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bicknell B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bicknell B.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bicknell B.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
23
Break points saved·Dominant
49
88
Break points won·Even
5
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
12
26
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bicknell B.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 163 days (−1.5)
Langmo C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+36 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1254
5.5Overall Elo 1313
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
3.8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bicknell B.Langmo C.
Freshness·Dominant
99
65

Bicknell B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Kypson P.[1]
Ponwith N.[7]
6-37-5
Sheehy J.
Markes C.
6-26-727-5
Sekulic P.[11]
Sinclair C.[5]
6-36-4
Trotter J.
Clark E.[12]
7-56-4
Bicknell B.
Ellis B.
6-16-0
Chappell N.[4]
Cozbinov A.[10]
7-640-67-61
Q1
Clark E.[12]
Weekes J.
7-52-67-5
Kypson P.[1]
Mccormick T.
7-656-2
Ponwith N.[7]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Cozbinov A.[10]
Martin D.
1-66-46-1
Ellis B.
Rai A.[9]
5-76-47-5
Sheehy J.
Puttergill C.
6-47-60
Bicknell B.
Langmo C.[3]
6-17-68
Sinclair C.[5]
Damm M.
6-747-686-3
Trotter J.
Kirchheimer S.[6]
7-656-4
Sekulic P.[11]
Perez A.
6-36-4
Markes C.
Escobedo E.[8]
6-16-3
Kypson P.
Mccormick T.
7-656-2
Chappell N.[4]
Rice K.
6-16-3