Mathys Erhard vs Facundo Diaz Acosta — Amersfoort CH Quarter-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA
Mathys Erhard
#377ATP
1382ELO
1351Clay ELO
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 17 July 2023
clay
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG1
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#120ATP
1681ELO
1668Clay ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWLL
Erhard M.
6-3 0-0
Diaz Acosta F.
Erhard M.
60–
Diaz Acosta F.
30–

Mathys Erhard advanced when Facundo Diaz Acosta retired 6-3 0-0 in the Amersfoort CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Erhard M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Diaz Acosta F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Erhard M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Erhard M.Diaz Acosta F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (133 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Erhard M.Diaz Acosta F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
60
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
89
Break points won·Clear edge
19
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
37
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
11
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Erhard M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Diaz Acosta F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
1.6Clay Elo 1351
Surface ELO
8.4+317 Clay Elo edge
1.9Overall Elo 1382
ELO gap
8.1Overall Elo 1681
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
8.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
3.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Erhard M.Diaz Acosta F.
Freshness·Dominant
78
51

Erhard M.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d) · Diaz Acosta F.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 131 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Marterer M.[5]
Droguet T.[8]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Droguet T.[8]
Erhard M.
7-56-1
Marterer M.[5]
Molleker R.
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Marterer M.[5]
Geerts M.
6-16-2
Droguet T.[8]
Deckers A.
6-34-66-3
Erhard M.
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
6-30-0
Molleker R.
Onclin G.
6-26-2
R16
Droguet T.[8]
Moller E.
6-36-4
Onclin G.
Den Ouden G.
7-667-66
Deckers A.
Choinski J.[3]
6-27-65
Marterer M.[5]
Mensik J.
6-37-63
Geerts M.
De Loore J.
7-626-746-4
Molleker R.
Delbonis F.
6-16-3
Erhard M.
Ionel N.[7]
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-34-66-4
R32
Erhard M.
Colson T.
7-667-63
Geerts M.
Meligeni Alves F.[2]
3-66-26-2
Mensik J.
Guinard M.
6-26-2
Marterer M.[5]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Den Ouden G.
De Jong J.[6]
6-43-66-3
Choinski J.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Onclin G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-2
De Loore J.
Marti Pujolras A.
6-36-3
Delbonis F.
Sels J.[4]
7-626-2
Molleker R.
Jong S.
6-47-63
Droguet T.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-16-4
Moller E.
Visker N.
6-26-1
Deckers A.
Landaluce M.
7-647-5
Ionel N.[7]
Houkes M.
7-646-2
Travaglia S.
Potenza L.
6-26-3
Diaz Acosta F.[1]
Blanchet U.
6-16-2