Blaz Rola vs Filip Misolic — Salzburg CH Quarter-final

Salzburg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
SLO
Blaz Rola
35 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 July 2023
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT8
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Rola B.
6-3 6-3
Misolic F.
Rola B.
662
Misolic F.
330

Blaz Rola defeated Filip Misolic 6-3 6-3 in the Salzburg CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Filip Misolic came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rola B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rola B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rola B.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rola B.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
17
79
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
91
Break points won·Dominant
5
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rola B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Misolic F.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Ofner S.[3]
Neumayer L.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[3]
Cerundolo J.[5]
6-06-2
Neumayer L.
Rola B.
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Neumayer L.
Monteiro T.[4]
6-46-4
Ofner S.[3]
Fatic N.
4-67-647-5
Cerundolo J.[5]
Ymer E.
1-66-26-3
Rola B.
Misolic F.[8]
6-36-3
R16
Neumayer L.
Bagnis F.[7]
7-637-5
Monteiro T.[4]
Trungelliti M.
4-66-46-3
Rola B.
Kopriva V.
6-31-66-3
Misolic F.[8]
Guinard M.
7-57-65
Ymer E.
Varillas J.[2]
7-636-2
Cerundolo J.[5]
Barrena A.
6-24-66-1
Ofner S.[3]
Klein L.
6-47-5
Fatic N.
Rodionov J.[6]
7-56-4
R32
Ofner S.[3]
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Varillas J.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-46-1
Rodionov J.[6]
Durasovic V.
6-42-67-64
Bagnis F.[7]
Neuchrist M.
6-46-747-5
Neumayer L.
Nagal S.
6-47-63
Trungelliti M.
Ritschard A.
1-66-37-5
Misolic F.[8]
Kopp S.
7-56-2
Guinard M.
Gombos N.
6-756-37-5
Kopriva V.
Oberleitner N.
6-766-16-1
Rola B.
Carballes Baena R.[1]
7-646-1
Monteiro T.[4]
Krutykh O.
6-33-67-63
Ymer E.
Dzumhur D.
7-56-3
Barrena A.
Santillan A.
6-36-0
Cerundolo J.[5]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Klein L.
Novak D.
7-55-76-3
Fatic N.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-07-5