Kei Nishikori vs Skander Mansouri — Chicago CH Round of 16

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
JPN
Kei Nishikori
#717ATP
1714ELO
1680Hard ELO
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 July 2023
hard
TUN
Skander Mansouri
#1250ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
Nishikori K.
7-6 6-4
Mansouri S.
Nishikori K.
7762
Mansouri S.
6140

Kei Nishikori defeated Skander Mansouri 7-6 6-4 in the Chicago CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nishikori K.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Mansouri S.

Mansouri S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nishikori K.

Serve advantage — Nishikori K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nishikori K.Mansouri S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
45%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.4
8.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (77 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nishikori K.Mansouri S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
89
2
Break points saved·Dominant
97
62
Break points won·Dominant
74
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nishikori K.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mansouri S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Shimizu Y.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
7-657-65
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[4]
4-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Lajal M.
7-634-67-66
Shimizu Y.
Jung J.
6-27-5
Shang J.[4]
Quinn E.
7-56-1
Michelsen A.
Nishikori K.
7-6133-66-1
R16
Jung J.
Basavareddy N.
3-67-656-2
Michelsen A.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-46-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Walton A.
7-636-4
Shang J.[4]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Quinn E.
Schoolkate T.
4-66-36-2
Shimizu Y.
Chung Y.
6-35-76-3
Lajal M.
Uchiyama Y.
4-66-26-2
Nishikori K.
Mansouri S.
7-616-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[3]
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Tu L.
7-636-757-65
Shang J.[4]
Kukushkin M.
7-653-2
Nishikori K.
Galarneau A.[6]
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Escobedo E.
7-660-66-4
Marchenko I.
Sweeny D.
6-46-4
Walton A.
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.[8]
6-32-66-4
Jung J.
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Mansouri S.
Mccabe J.
3-66-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[5]
6-47-62
Shimizu Y.
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Chung Y.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-46-4