Christian Langmo vs Nathan Ponwith — Chicago CH Qualifying Round 1

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Christian Langmo
USA8
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 July 2023
hard
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Langmo C.
6-4 7-5
Ponwith N.
Langmo C.
672
Ponwith N.
450

Christian Langmo defeated Nathan Ponwith 6-4 7-5 in the Chicago CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Langmo C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Serve advantage — Langmo C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Langmo C.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Langmo C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ponwith N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
4.1
Surface form
1.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Langmo C.Ponwith N.
Freshness·
65
—

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Tomic B.[10]
Zhu E.[6]
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Langmo C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Chung Y.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-03-66-3
Escobedo E.
Damm M.
7-666-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Kingsley C.
7-666-1
Jasika O.[1]
Sinclair C.[12]
6-46-4
Q1
Chung Y.[3]
Fenty A.
7-56-2
Marchenko I.[7]
Angele J.
7-646-4
Schoolkate T.[5]
Mukund S.
6-46-1
Tomic B.[10]
Zheng M.
4-66-26-4
Zhu E.[6]
Cassone M.
3-66-27-5
Langmo C.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-47-5
Damm M.
Bolt A.[9]
7-616-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Mchugh A.[11]
7-53-67-65
Kingsley C.
Moriya H.[2]
6-26-3
Sinclair C.[12]
Kirchheimer S.
7-656-4
Jasika O.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
7-56-1
Escobedo E.
Ly N.[4]
6-16-0