Juncheng Shang vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHN4
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 10 July 2023
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Shang J.
7-6 3-2
Kukushkin M.
Shang J.
773–
Kukushkin M.
652–

Juncheng Shang advanced when Mikhail Kukushkin retired 7-6 3-2 in the Chicago CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Kukushkin M.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
46
Break points saved·Even
96
93
Break points won·Even
45
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+173 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1526
7.2Overall Elo 1746
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1552
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.6
Surface form
7.9
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
3.2
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Shimizu Y.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
7-657-65
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[4]
4-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Lajal M.
7-634-67-66
Shimizu Y.
Jung J.
6-27-5
Shang J.[4]
Quinn E.
7-56-1
Michelsen A.
Nishikori K.
7-6133-66-1
R16
Jung J.
Basavareddy N.
3-67-656-2
Michelsen A.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-46-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Walton A.
7-636-4
Shang J.[4]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Quinn E.
Schoolkate T.
4-66-36-2
Shimizu Y.
Chung Y.
6-35-76-3
Lajal M.
Uchiyama Y.
4-66-26-2
Nishikori K.
Mansouri S.
7-616-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[3]
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Tu L.
7-636-757-65
Shang J.[4]
Kukushkin M.
7-653-2
Nishikori K.
Galarneau A.[6]
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Escobedo E.
7-660-66-4
Marchenko I.
Sweeny D.
6-46-4
Walton A.
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.[8]
6-32-66-4
Jung J.
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Mansouri S.
Mccabe J.
3-66-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[5]
6-47-62
Shimizu Y.
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Chung Y.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-46-4