Omar Jasika vs Colin Sinclair — Chicago CH Qualifying Round 2

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
AUS1
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 July 2023
hard
NMI12
Colin Sinclair
#513ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLWL
Jasika O.
6-4 6-4
Sinclair C.
Jasika O.
662
Sinclair C.
440

Omar Jasika defeated Colin Sinclair 6-4 6-4 in the Chicago CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Omar Jasika edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sinclair C.

Sinclair C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Sinclair C.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
7.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Sinclair C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
17
Break points saved·Dominant
47
75
Break points won·Even
13
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
13
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
1
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sinclair C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
5.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Tomic B.[10]
Zhu E.[6]
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Langmo C.[8]
6-31-67-5
Chung Y.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-03-66-3
Escobedo E.
Damm M.
7-666-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Kingsley C.
7-666-1
Jasika O.[1]
Sinclair C.[12]
6-46-4
Q1
Chung Y.[3]
Fenty A.
7-56-2
Marchenko I.[7]
Angele J.
7-646-4
Schoolkate T.[5]
Mukund S.
6-46-1
Tomic B.[10]
Zheng M.
4-66-26-4
Zhu E.[6]
Cassone M.
3-66-27-5
Langmo C.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-47-5
Damm M.
Bolt A.[9]
7-616-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Mchugh A.[11]
7-53-67-65
Kingsley C.
Moriya H.[2]
6-26-3
Sinclair C.[12]
Kirchheimer S.
7-656-4
Jasika O.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
7-56-1
Escobedo E.
Ly N.[4]
6-16-0