Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Emilio Gomez — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 July 2023
hard
ECU3
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Uchiyama Y.
6-2 6-1
Gomez E.
Uchiyama Y.
662
Gomez E.
210

Yasutaka Uchiyama defeated Emilio Gomez 6-2 6-1 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uchiyama Y.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Serve advantage — Uchiyama Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uchiyama Y.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchiyama Y.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Even
30
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
77
Break points won·Clear edge
2
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
45
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Uchiyama Y.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.4No prior meetings
H2H
4.6
6.5
Surface form
4.1
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Shimizu Y.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
7-657-65
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[4]
4-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Lajal M.
7-634-67-66
Shimizu Y.
Jung J.
6-27-5
Shang J.[4]
Quinn E.
7-56-1
Michelsen A.
Nishikori K.
7-6133-66-1
R16
Jung J.
Basavareddy N.
3-67-656-2
Michelsen A.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-46-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Walton A.
7-636-4
Shang J.[4]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Quinn E.
Schoolkate T.
4-66-36-2
Shimizu Y.
Chung Y.
6-35-76-3
Lajal M.
Uchiyama Y.
4-66-26-2
Nishikori K.
Mansouri S.
7-616-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[3]
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Tu L.
7-636-757-65
Shang J.[4]
Kukushkin M.
7-653-2
Nishikori K.
Galarneau A.[6]
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Escobedo E.
7-660-66-4
Marchenko I.
Sweeny D.
6-46-4
Walton A.
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.[8]
6-32-66-4
Jung J.
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Mansouri S.
Mccabe J.
3-66-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[5]
6-47-62
Shimizu Y.
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Chung Y.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-46-4