Nishesh Basavareddy vs Steve Johnson — Chicago CH Round of 32

Chicago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Nishesh Basavareddy
#142ATP
1722ELO
1681Hard ELO
$365kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
21 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 July 2023
hard
USA8
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
Basavareddy N.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Johnson S.
Basavareddy N.
6262
Johnson S.
3641

Nishesh Basavareddy defeated Steve Johnson 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Chicago CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basavareddy N.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Johnson S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Basavareddy N.

Serve advantage — Basavareddy N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Basavareddy N.Johnson S.
25
Serve
—
31
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Basavareddy N.Johnson S.
1st serve in·Even
58%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
7.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (162 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basavareddy N.Johnson S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
97
Break points won·Dominant
49
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
93
64
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
92
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basavareddy N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Johnson S.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
2.8
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Michelsen A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Shimizu Y.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
7-657-65
Michelsen A.
Shang J.[4]
4-67-56-3
Quarter-finals
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Lajal M.
7-634-67-66
Shimizu Y.
Jung J.
6-27-5
Shang J.[4]
Quinn E.
7-56-1
Michelsen A.
Nishikori K.
7-6133-66-1
R16
Jung J.
Basavareddy N.
3-67-656-2
Michelsen A.
Kovacevic A.[2]
6-46-2
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Walton A.
7-636-4
Shang J.[4]
Marchenko I.
7-56-3
Quinn E.
Schoolkate T.
4-66-36-2
Shimizu Y.
Chung Y.
6-35-76-3
Lajal M.
Uchiyama Y.
4-66-26-2
Nishikori K.
Mansouri S.
7-616-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[3]
6-26-1
Kovacevic A.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-4
Michelsen A.
Tu L.
7-636-757-65
Shang J.[4]
Kukushkin M.
7-653-2
Nishikori K.
Galarneau A.[6]
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Escobedo E.
7-660-66-4
Marchenko I.
Sweeny D.
6-46-4
Walton A.
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Jasika O.
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.
Johnson S.[8]
6-32-66-4
Jung J.
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Mansouri S.
Mccabe J.
3-66-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[5]
6-47-62
Shimizu Y.
Zhu E.
6-26-4
Chung Y.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[7]
Sandgren T.
6-46-4