Tennys Sandgren vs Sasi Kumar Mukund — Bloomfield Hills CH Quarter-final

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
hard
IND
Sasi Kumar Mukund
1306ELO
1281Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Sandgren T.
7-5 6-4
Mukund S.
Sandgren T.
762
Mukund S.
540

Tennys Sandgren defeated Sasi Kumar Mukund 7-5 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mukund S.

Mukund S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve advantage — Sandgren T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Mukund S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.9
6.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Mukund S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
20
Break points won·Even
2
5
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Mukund S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-777-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Kudla D.[3]
6-46-1
Johnson S.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-707-64
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[2]
6-26-4
Johnson S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[4]
7-647-5
Jasika O.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-3
Kudla D.[3]
Nishikori K.
6-43-66-3
Mukund S.
Galarneau A.[5]
4-66-27-5
Kukushkin M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
3-66-36-2
Sandgren T.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-43-66-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-16-3
Celikbilek A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-736-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-5
Mccabe J.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-747-65
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Basavareddy N.
3-66-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Harrison C.
6-26-777-65
Kudla D.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-35-76-3
Sandgren T.
Krueger M.
4-66-17-65
Jasika O.
Sweeny D.[8]
7-56-1
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-16-2
Shimizu Y.
Escobedo E.
7-654-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Zhu E.
6-706-26-4
Galarneau A.[5]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-3
Gomez E.[2]
Zheng M.
6-46-1
Mukund S.
Quinn E.
7-54-67-64
Johnson S.[7]
Mchugh A.
7-676-4