Steve Johnson vs Yasutaka Uchiyama — Bloomfield Hills CH Quarter-final

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA7
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
hard
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Johnson S.
6-4 6-7 7-6
Uchiyama Y.
Johnson S.
660772
Uchiyama Y.
477641

Steve Johnson defeated Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-4 6-7 7-6 in the Bloomfield Hills CH quarter-final on hard. Steve Johnson extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-19Los CabosR16hardSteve Johnson7-6(4) 6-3
2019-09-30TokyoQ1hardYasutaka Uchiyama6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Johnson S.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Uchiyama Y.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johnson S.Uchiyama Y.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Even
7.3
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johnson S.Uchiyama Y.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
91
Break points won·Slight edge
10
2
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
45
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johnson S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Uchiyama Y.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
1.6
Surface form
7.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-777-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Kudla D.[3]
6-46-1
Johnson S.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-707-64
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[2]
6-26-4
Johnson S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[4]
7-647-5
Jasika O.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-3
Kudla D.[3]
Nishikori K.
6-43-66-3
Mukund S.
Galarneau A.[5]
4-66-27-5
Kukushkin M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
3-66-36-2
Sandgren T.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-43-66-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-16-3
Celikbilek A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-736-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-5
Mccabe J.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-747-65
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Basavareddy N.
3-66-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Harrison C.
6-26-777-65
Kudla D.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-35-76-3
Sandgren T.
Krueger M.
4-66-17-65
Jasika O.
Sweeny D.[8]
7-56-1
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-16-2
Shimizu Y.
Escobedo E.
7-654-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Zhu E.
6-706-26-4
Galarneau A.[5]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-3
Gomez E.[2]
Zheng M.
6-46-1
Mukund S.
Quinn E.
7-54-67-64
Johnson S.[7]
Mchugh A.
7-676-4