Steve Johnson vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Bloomfield Hills CH Final

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Final
USA7
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Johnson S.
6-4 6-7 7-6
Kukushkin M.
Johnson S.
667772
Kukushkin M.
479641

Steve Johnson defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 6-4 6-7 7-6 in the Bloomfield Hills CH final on hard. Steve Johnson extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-13MemphisQFhardMikhail Kukushkin6-0 6-4
2015-03-25Miami MastersR128hardMikhail Kukushkin6-4 3-6 6-2
2015-02-16Delray BeachR32hardSteve Johnson6-3 4-1 RET
2014-02-17Delray BeachR32hardSteve Johnson6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Johnson S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johnson S.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johnson S.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
46
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Dominant
10
41
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johnson S.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kukushkin M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-777-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Kudla D.[3]
6-46-1
Johnson S.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-707-64
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[2]
6-26-4
Johnson S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[4]
7-647-5
Jasika O.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-3
Kudla D.[3]
Nishikori K.
6-43-66-3
Mukund S.
Galarneau A.[5]
4-66-27-5
Kukushkin M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
3-66-36-2
Sandgren T.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-43-66-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-16-3
Celikbilek A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-736-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-5
Mccabe J.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-747-65
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Basavareddy N.
3-66-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Harrison C.
6-26-777-65
Kudla D.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-35-76-3
Sandgren T.
Krueger M.
4-66-17-65
Jasika O.
Sweeny D.[8]
7-56-1
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-16-2
Shimizu Y.
Escobedo E.
7-654-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Zhu E.
6-706-26-4
Galarneau A.[5]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-3
Gomez E.[2]
Zheng M.
6-46-1
Mukund S.
Quinn E.
7-54-67-64
Johnson S.[7]
Mchugh A.
7-676-4