Emilio Gomez vs Michael Zheng — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 32

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
hard
USA
Michael Zheng
#121ATP
1695ELO
1672Hard ELO
$310kYTD
$502kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLW
Gomez E.
6-4 6-1
Zheng M.
Gomez E.
662
Zheng M.
410

Emilio Gomez defeated Michael Zheng 6-4 6-1 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zheng M.

Zheng M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Zheng M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Zheng M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 69). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zheng M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
7.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez E.Zheng M.
Freshness·
—
92

Zheng M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-777-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Kudla D.[3]
6-46-1
Johnson S.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-707-64
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[2]
6-26-4
Johnson S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[4]
7-647-5
Jasika O.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-3
Kudla D.[3]
Nishikori K.
6-43-66-3
Mukund S.
Galarneau A.[5]
4-66-27-5
Kukushkin M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
3-66-36-2
Sandgren T.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-43-66-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-16-3
Celikbilek A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-736-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-5
Mccabe J.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-747-65
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Basavareddy N.
3-66-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Harrison C.
6-26-777-65
Kudla D.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-35-76-3
Sandgren T.
Krueger M.
4-66-17-65
Jasika O.
Sweeny D.[8]
7-56-1
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-16-2
Shimizu Y.
Escobedo E.
7-654-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Zhu E.
6-706-26-4
Galarneau A.[5]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-3
Gomez E.[2]
Zheng M.
6-46-1
Mukund S.
Quinn E.
7-54-67-64
Johnson S.[7]
Mchugh A.
7-676-4