Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Emilio Gomez — Bloomfield Hills CH Round of 16

Bloomfield Hills CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
hard
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Uchiyama Y.
6-2 6-4
Gomez E.
Uchiyama Y.
662
Gomez E.
240

Yasutaka Uchiyama defeated Emilio Gomez 6-2 6-4 in the Bloomfield Hills CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uchiyama Y.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Serve advantage — Uchiyama Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uchiyama Y.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchiyama Y.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Even
30
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
77
Break points won·Clear edge
2
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
45
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Uchiyama Y.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Gomez E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.6
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-46-777-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-2
Kukushkin M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Sandgren T.
Mukund S.
7-56-4
Schoolkate T.
Jasika O.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.
Kudla D.[3]
6-46-1
Johnson S.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-46-707-64
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Gomez E.[2]
6-26-4
Johnson S.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-46-2
Schoolkate T.
Celikbilek A.[4]
7-647-5
Jasika O.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-3
Kudla D.[3]
Nishikori K.
6-43-66-3
Mukund S.
Galarneau A.[5]
4-66-27-5
Kukushkin M.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
3-66-36-2
Sandgren T.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-43-66-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.
Tu L.
6-16-3
Celikbilek A.[4]
Lajal M.
6-736-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
7-627-5
Mccabe J.
Shelbayh A.
6-36-747-65
Mpetshi Perricard G.[6]
Basavareddy N.
3-66-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Harrison C.
6-26-777-65
Kudla D.[3]
Mansouri S.
6-35-76-3
Sandgren T.
Krueger M.
4-66-17-65
Jasika O.
Sweeny D.[8]
7-56-1
Nishikori K.
Walton A.
6-16-2
Shimizu Y.
Escobedo E.
7-654-66-3
Schoolkate T.
Zhu E.
6-706-26-4
Galarneau A.[5]
Spizzirri E.
7-636-3
Gomez E.[2]
Zheng M.
6-46-1
Mukund S.
Quinn E.
7-54-67-64
Johnson S.[7]
Mchugh A.
7-676-4