Ivan Gakhov vs Nerman Fatic — Karlsruhe CH Round of 32

Karlsruhe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS7
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Gakhov I.
7-6 6-2
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
7862
Fatic N.
6620

Ivan Gakhov defeated Nerman Fatic 7-6 6-2 in the Karlsruhe CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
34
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
63
Break points won·Dominant
9
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Clay Elo 1384
Surface ELO
6.2+94 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1496
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.8
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.2
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabilo A.[8]
Zeppieri G.[4]
2-61-0
Semi-finals
Tabilo A.[8]
Skatov T.[6]
6-46-1
Zeppieri G.[4]
Piros Z.[1]
2-66-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tabilo A.[8]
Riedi L.
6-13-67-5
Skatov T.[6]
Habib H.
6-36-2
Zeppieri G.[4]
Gakhov I.[7]
6-16-4
Piros Z.[1]
Seyboth Wild T.[5]
6-32-66-3
R16
Riedi L.
Kotov P.[2]
6-27-67
Habib H.
Martinez P.[3]
7-627-5
Skatov T.[6]
Sachko V.
3-67-687-67
Gakhov I.[7]
Molleker R.
6-43-66-3
Seyboth Wild T.[5]
Topo M.
6-46-2
Tabilo A.[8]
Gavrielides L.
6-16-1
Zeppieri G.[4]
Paire B.
4-66-36-4
Piros Z.[1]
Handel T.
7-676-3
R32
Kotov P.[2]
Dougaz A.
2-66-27-5
Gavrielides L.
Roca Batalla O.
2-67-687-63
Tabilo A.[8]
Squire H.
7-56-1
Habib H.
Laaksonen H.
6-16-3
Gakhov I.[7]
Fatic N.
7-666-2
Zeppieri G.[4]
Santillan A.
6-37-5
Seyboth Wild T.[5]
Yevseyev D.
4-66-36-3
Sachko V.
Ficovich J.
6-06-3
Molleker R.
Geerts M.
3-66-37-5
Piros Z.[1]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-65
Skatov T.[6]
Rodesch C.
6-43-66-2
Paire B.
Casanova H.
6-37-5
Riedi L.
Kopriva V.
4-66-36-2
Martinez P.[3]
Gombos N.
6-726-46-3
Handel T.
Blanch D.
5-77-56-0
Topo M.
Zekic M.
6-36-4