Francisco Comesana vs Alvaro Guillen Meza — Santa Fe CH Quarter-final

Santa Fe CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Francisco Comesana
ARG4
Francisco Comesana
#91ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
clay
ECU
Alvaro Guillen Meza
#276ATP
1442ELO
1412Clay ELO
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
Comesana F.
6-0 7-6
Guillen Meza A.
Comesana F.
6772
Guillen Meza A.
0630

Francisco Comesana defeated Alvaro Guillen Meza 6-0 7-6 in the Santa Fe CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Francisco Comesana came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Comesana F.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Guillen Meza A.

Guillen Meza A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Comesana F.Guillen Meza A.
55
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Comesana F.Guillen Meza A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 157). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Comesana F.Guillen Meza A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
19
Break points saved·Dominant
90
43
Break points won·Slight edge
36
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
38
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Comesana F.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Guillen Meza A.
3.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 245 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.5+245 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Clay Elo 1412
6.7Overall Elo 1695
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1442
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.9
Surface form
3.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Comesana F.Guillen Meza A.
Freshness·Even
87
90

Comesana F.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Guillen Meza A.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 26 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Navone M.[1]
Vallejo A.
6-26-4
Navone M.
Pellegrino A.
3-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Vallejo A.
Burruchaga R.[3]
4-67-656-4
Navone M.[1]
Comesana F.[4]
7-57-5
Pellegrino A.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Monteiro T.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Vallejo A.
Monzon I.
6-06-4
Comesana F.[4]
Guillen Meza A.
6-07-63
Navone M.[1]
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Burruchaga R.[3]
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
6-37-5
Monteiro T.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Delbonis F.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Coria F.[1]
6-03-2
Navone M.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
7-626-4
R16
Monzon I.
Lingua Lavallen A.
7-616-3
Vallejo A.
Franco Descotte M.[9]
3-66-46-1
Comesana F.[4]
Lama G.
6-36-3
Navone M.[1]
Ambrogi L.
6-46-1
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
7-664-66-3
Farjat T.
Gimenez I.
6-36-736-2
Guillen Meza A.
Soto M.
6-36-1
Burruchaga R.[3]
Tacchi L.
7-626-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-664-66-3
Kopriva V.[4]
Burruchaga R.
6-36-0
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Darderi L.
6-44-67-63
Monteiro T.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-1
Bagnis F.
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Trungelliti M.
6-12-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Kovalik J.
4-67-657-62
Delbonis F.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[5]
6-33-66-4
R32
Burruchaga R.[3]
Alves M.
6-23-66-3
Farjat T.
Tenti F.
6-756-46-3
Lingua Lavallen A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-43-66-3
Kuzuhara B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
Brown P.
7-656-3
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-46-4
Soto M.
Villalon N.
6-27-65
Lama G.
Rodriguez L.
6-36-726-4
Comesana F.[4]
Justo G.
6-26-4
Gimenez I.
Ribeiro E.[6]
6-24-66-4
Ambrogi L.
Carou I.
4-66-36-1
Franco Descotte M.[9]
Ratti L.
6-06-2
Monzon I.
La Serna J.
6-37-5
Vallejo A.
De La Fuente S.
4-66-36-0
Navone M.[1]
Loureiro J.
6-26-4
Kuzuhara B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.
Olivieri G.[7]
7-52-0
Darderi L.
Torres J.
6-14-0
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[5]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Monteiro T.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-32-67-64
Taberner C.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-47-5
Navone M.
Barrena A.
6-776-26-2
Kovalik J.
Agamenone F.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-0
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Neumayer L.
7-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Svrcina D.
Ficovich J.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Delbonis F.
Bicknell B.
6-26-2
Burruchaga R.
Bueno G.
4-66-36-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-00-66-3