Mariano Navone vs Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi — Santa Fe CH Round of 16

Santa Fe CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mariano Navone
ARG1
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 July 2023
clay
ARG
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
#315ATP
1392ELO
1382Clay ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Navone M.
6-4 6-1
Ambrogi L.
Navone M.
662
Ambrogi L.
410

Mariano Navone defeated Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi 6-4 6-1 in the Santa Fe CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #48.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Navone M.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ambrogi L.

Ambrogi L.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Navone M.Ambrogi L.
0
Serve
—
95
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Navone M.Ambrogi L.
1st serve in·Even
67%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
57%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Navone M.Ambrogi L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
2
Break points saved·Dominant
86
27
Break points won·Dominant
90
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Navone M.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Ambrogi L.
2.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 182 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0+418 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1382
10.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1392
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Navone M.Ambrogi L.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
86

Navone M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Ambrogi L.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Navone M.[1]
Vallejo A.
6-26-4
Navone M.
Pellegrino A.
3-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Vallejo A.
Burruchaga R.[3]
4-67-656-4
Navone M.[1]
Comesana F.[4]
7-57-5
Pellegrino A.
Kopriva V.[4]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Monteiro T.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Vallejo A.
Monzon I.
6-06-4
Comesana F.[4]
Guillen Meza A.
6-07-63
Navone M.[1]
Farjat T.
6-26-3
Burruchaga R.[3]
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
6-37-5
Monteiro T.
Bagnis F.
6-26-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Delbonis F.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Coria F.[1]
6-03-2
Navone M.
Barrios Vera T.[3]
7-626-4
R16
Monzon I.
Lingua Lavallen A.
7-616-3
Vallejo A.
Franco Descotte M.[9]
3-66-46-1
Comesana F.[4]
Lama G.
6-36-3
Navone M.[1]
Ambrogi L.
6-46-1
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
Kuzuhara B.
7-664-66-3
Farjat T.
Gimenez I.
6-36-736-2
Guillen Meza A.
Soto M.
6-36-1
Burruchaga R.[3]
Tacchi L.
7-626-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Kuzuhara B.
7-664-66-3
Kopriva V.[4]
Burruchaga R.
6-36-0
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Darderi L.
6-44-67-63
Monteiro T.
Taberner C.
6-44-66-1
Bagnis F.
Svrcina D.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Trungelliti M.
6-12-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Kovalik J.
4-67-657-62
Delbonis F.
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
6-16-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[5]
6-33-66-4
R32
Burruchaga R.[3]
Alves M.
6-23-66-3
Farjat T.
Tenti F.
6-756-46-3
Lingua Lavallen A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-43-66-3
Kuzuhara B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Boscardin Dias P.[8]
Brown P.
7-656-3
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-46-4
Soto M.
Villalon N.
6-27-65
Lama G.
Rodriguez L.
6-36-726-4
Comesana F.[4]
Justo G.
6-26-4
Gimenez I.
Ribeiro E.[6]
6-24-66-4
Ambrogi L.
Carou I.
4-66-36-1
Franco Descotte M.[9]
Ratti L.
6-06-2
Monzon I.
La Serna J.
6-37-5
Vallejo A.
De La Fuente S.
4-66-36-0
Navone M.[1]
Loureiro J.
6-26-4
Kuzuhara B.
Catarina L.
6-26-4
Bagnis F.
Olivieri G.[7]
7-52-0
Darderi L.
Torres J.
6-14-0
Barrios Vera T.[3]
Andreozzi G.
7-636-2
Comesana F.[5]
Bonadio R.
6-46-2
Monteiro T.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-32-67-64
Taberner C.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-47-5
Navone M.
Barrena A.
6-776-26-2
Kovalik J.
Agamenone F.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-0
Meligeni Alves F.[8]
Neumayer L.
7-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Svrcina D.
Ficovich J.
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.
Collarini A.
6-36-4
Delbonis F.
Bicknell B.
6-26-2
Burruchaga R.
Bueno G.
4-66-36-0
Kopriva V.[4]
Vallejo A.
6-00-66-3