Patrick Kypson vs Matias Soto — Medellin CH Quarter-final

Medellin CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Patrick Kypson
USA7
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1555Clay ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1412Clay ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Kypson P.
6-3 6-2
Soto M.
Kypson P.
662
Soto M.
320

Patrick Kypson defeated Matias Soto 6-3 6-2 in the Medellin CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #112.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Soto M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve advantage — Kypson P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Soto M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Soto M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
34
Break points saved·Dominant
93
51
Break points won·Dominant
41
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kypson P.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Soto M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+143 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1412
6.9Overall Elo 1641
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1421
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Soto M.
Freshness·Dominant
94
56

Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Lock B.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kypson P.[7]
Ribeiro E.
6-47-64
Lock B.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.[7]
Soto M.
6-36-2
Soriano Barrera A.
Mejia N.
1-67-656-2
Lock B.
Serdarusic N.[6]
6-46-4
Ribeiro E.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-34-66-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Luz O.
7-636-3
Serdarusic N.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
7-56-4
Mejia N.
Puttergill C.
6-46-3
Soto M.
Heide G.
6-33-66-1
Ribeiro E.
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Soriano Barrera A.
Mccormick T.
7-656-747-65
Soriano Barrera A.
Mccormick T.
7-656-747-65
Kypson P.[7]
Lama G.
7-676-1
Lock B.
Alves M.
7-654-66-1
R32
Ribeiro E.
Schoolkate T.[8]
6-27-64
Heide G.
Delbonis F.[3]
7-56-4
Lama G.
Barrena A.
6-736-46-4
Serdarusic N.[6]
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Panta Herreros J.
Sakamoto P.
6-46-2
Alves M.
Santamaria F.
6-46-4
Puttergill C.
Monzon I.
6-37-63
Mejia N.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-27-63
Soriano Barrera A.
Zanellato N.
7-636-2
Lock B.
Reis Da Silva J.[4]
6-36-1
Kypson P.[7]
Franco Descotte M.
6-46-3
Mccormick T.
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-736-17-65
Soto M.
Rehberg M.
7-651-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Mayo A.
7-656-3
Luz O.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-3
Melzer G.
Statham J.
1-66-47-60
Mccormick T.
Andreozzi G.
6-736-17-65