Matias Soto vs Gustavo Heide — Medellin CH Round of 16

Medellin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1412Clay ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
BRA
Gustavo Heide
#136ATP
1695ELO
1679Clay ELO
$167kYTD
$609kCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Soto M.
6-3 3-6 6-1
Heide G.
Soto M.
6362
Heide G.
3611

Matias Soto defeated Gustavo Heide 6-3 3-6 6-1 in the Medellin CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gustavo Heide came in ranked #136.

Key context

  • Match story: Matias Soto closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Soto M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Heide G.

Heide G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Serve advantage — Heide G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Soto M.Heide G.
1st serve in·Even
57%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (130 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Soto M.Heide G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
51
Break points saved·Dominant
51
90
Break points won·Even
14
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
68
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
56
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Soto M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Heide G.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1412
Surface ELO
6.9+267 Clay Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1421
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1695
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
0.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Soto M.Heide G.
Freshness·Clear edge
56
72

Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d) · Heide G.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Lock B.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kypson P.[7]
Ribeiro E.
6-47-64
Lock B.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.[7]
Soto M.
6-36-2
Soriano Barrera A.
Mejia N.
1-67-656-2
Lock B.
Serdarusic N.[6]
6-46-4
Ribeiro E.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-34-66-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Luz O.
7-636-3
Serdarusic N.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
7-56-4
Mejia N.
Puttergill C.
6-46-3
Soto M.
Heide G.
6-33-66-1
Ribeiro E.
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Soriano Barrera A.
Mccormick T.
7-656-747-65
Soriano Barrera A.
Mccormick T.
7-656-747-65
Kypson P.[7]
Lama G.
7-676-1
Lock B.
Alves M.
7-654-66-1
R32
Ribeiro E.
Schoolkate T.[8]
6-27-64
Heide G.
Delbonis F.[3]
7-56-4
Lama G.
Barrena A.
6-736-46-4
Serdarusic N.[6]
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Panta Herreros J.
Sakamoto P.
6-46-2
Alves M.
Santamaria F.
6-46-4
Puttergill C.
Monzon I.
6-37-63
Mejia N.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-27-63
Soriano Barrera A.
Zanellato N.
7-636-2
Lock B.
Reis Da Silva J.[4]
6-36-1
Kypson P.[7]
Franco Descotte M.
6-46-3
Mccormick T.
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-736-17-65
Soto M.
Rehberg M.
7-651-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Mayo A.
7-656-3
Luz O.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-3
Melzer G.
Statham J.
1-66-47-60
Mccormick T.
Andreozzi G.
6-736-17-65