Camila Giorgi vs Ons Jabeur — Eastbourne Round of 16

Eastbourne · WTA · Round of 16
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
grass
TUN4
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Giorgi C.
6-3 6-2
Jabeur O.
Giorgi C.
662
Jabeur O.
320

Camila Giorgi defeated Ons Jabeur 6-3 6-2 in the Eastbourne round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Camila Giorgi came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Camila Giorgi extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-10-06LinzR16hardCamila Giorgi6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Giorgi C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Jabeur O.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Giorgi C.Jabeur O.
1st serve in·Even
56%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 112). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giorgi C.Jabeur O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
90
Break points won·Clear edge
81
96
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
83
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giorgi C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jabeur O.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
8.0
5.4
Country comfort
6.2
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
20°CPartly cloudy
Wind 26 km/hHumidity 53%

Draw

Final
Keys M.[2]
Kasatkina D.[9]
6-27-613
Semi-finals
Keys M.[2]
Gauff C.[5]
6-36-3
Kasatkina D.[9]
Giorgi C.
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Giorgi C.
Ostapenko J.[3]
7-68
Kasatkina D.[9]
Garcia C.[2]
6-22-1
Gauff C.[5]
Pegula J.[3]
6-36-3
Keys M.[2]
Martic P.
6-46-1
R16
Keys M.[2]
Wang X.
6-27-63
Martic P.
Haddad Maia B.[8]
6-43-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Dart H.
6-36-4
Giorgi C.
Jabeur O.[4]
6-36-2
Kasatkina D.[9]
Pliskova K.
3-66-36-3
Garcia C.[2]
Bogdan A.
6-36-4
Gauff C.[5]
Burrage J.
6-16-1
Pegula J.[3]
Osorio C.[6]
6-21-66-3
R32
Keys M.[2]
Martincova T.
7-646-4
Dart H.
Zhang S.
7-56-756-1
Pliskova K.
Mertens E.
6-736-33-0
Jabeur O.[4]
Paolini J.[1]
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Strycova B.
6-46-3
Gauff C.[5]
Pera B.
6-36-2
Bogdan A.
Cirstea S.
6-32-66-3
Osorio C.[6]
Rogers S.
6-46-4
Wang X.
Marino R.
6-46-2
Haddad Maia B.[8]
Bouzkova M.
3-66-37-63
Pegula J.[3]
Zheng Q.
6-36-4
Giorgi C.
Watson H.
6-36-4
Kasatkina D.[9]
Kalinina A.
6-36-1
Burrage J.
Davis L.
4-66-46-3
Martic P.
Boulter K.
6-47-5
Garcia C.[2]
Brengle M.
6-17-5