Mackenzie Mcdonald vs Taylor Fritz — Eastbourne Round of 16

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 16
Mackenzie Mcdonald
USA
Mackenzie Mcdonald
#145ATP
1606ELO
1541Grass ELO
$240kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
grass
Taylor Fritz
USA1
Taylor Fritz
#7ATP
1909ELO
1857Grass ELO
$1.6MYTD
$31MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
Mcdonald M.
7-6 7-6
Fritz T.
Mcdonald M.
777102
Fritz T.
63680

Mackenzie Mcdonald defeated Taylor Fritz 7-6 7-6 in the Eastbourne round of 16 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Taylor Fritz came in ranked #7, defending the title. Mackenzie Mcdonald extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-13Delray BeachSFhardTaylor Fritz6-3 7-6(6)
2019-02-18Delray BeachR32hardMackenzie Mcdonald3-6 6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Mcdonald M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Fritz T.

Fritz T.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Mcdonald M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mcdonald M.Fritz T.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
70%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
11.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mcdonald M.Fritz T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
87
Break points saved·Even
96
100
Break points won·Slight edge
66
60
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mcdonald M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Fritz T.
8.1
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.8Grass Elo 1541
Surface ELO
9.2+315 Grass Elo edge
0.8Overall Elo 1606
ELO gap
9.2Overall Elo 1909
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
6.3
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mcdonald M.Fritz T.
Freshness·Clear edge
89
67

Mcdonald M.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Fritz T.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo F.[4]
Paul T.[2]
6-41-66-4
Semi-finals
Paul T.[2]
Barrere G.
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[4]
Mcdonald M.
2-67-56-2
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-26-3
Paul T.[2]
Wolf J.
6-44-67-62
Mcdonald M.
Ymer M.
6-43-66-3
Barrere G.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
7-57-62
R16
Cerundolo F.[4]
Huesler M.
7-627-65
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Vukic A.
7-666-4
Zhang Z.
Cressy M.
3-67-56-4
Mcdonald M.
Fritz T.[1]
7-637-68
Ymer M.
Broady L.
6-26-4
Paul T.[2]
Baez S.
6-17-67
Barrere G.
Jarry N.[5]
6-34-66-4
Wolf J.
Van Assche L.
6-26-756-1
R32
Vukic A.
Nakashima B.
6-757-637-65
Ymer M.
Van De Zandschulp B.[9]
3-66-46-2
Huesler M.
Peniston R.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Loffhagen G.
2-67-657-64
Barrere G.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-67-667-64
Broady L.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Baez S.
Borges N.
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Wu Y.
7-647-65
Mcdonald M.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.
Sonego L.[7]
7-646-3
Cressy M.
Galan D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Etcheverry T.[6]
6-26-4