Nerman Fatic vs Lorenzo Giustino — Modena CH Round of 32

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH7
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1355Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Fatic N.
7-6 6-2
Giustino L.
Fatic N.
7762
Giustino L.
6420

Nerman Fatic defeated Lorenzo Giustino 7-6 6-2 in the Modena CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Giustino L.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Giustino L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 162). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Giustino L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
2
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
41
Break points won·Clear edge
36
12
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
12
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
35
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Giustino L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+124 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1355
5.6Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1420
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.4
Surface form
3.3
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Giustino L.
Freshness·
—
45

Giustino L.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[3]
Droguet T.
6-757-666-4
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Fatic N.[7]
6-33-66-4
Nava E.[3]
Echargui M.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Nava E.[3]
Ferrari G.
6-16-756-2
Fatic N.[7]
Coria F.[1]
6-42-66-3
Droguet T.
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-5
Echargui M.
Atmane T.[5]
7-674-66-2
R16
Droguet T.
Bertola R.
7-626-2
Kasnikowski M.
Travaglia S.
6-27-64
Fatic N.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Caruso S.
6-16-1
Ferrari G.
Olivo R.[6]
6-36-4
Echargui M.
Monteiro T.[2]
3-66-16-2
Atmane T.[5]
Forti F.
6-36-4
Nava E.[3]
Michalski D.
6-26-2
R32
Droguet T.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Gerch L.
7-656-4
Echargui M.
Crawford O.
6-47-5
Forti F.
Serafini M.
6-27-63
Monteiro T.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-726-36-3
Nava E.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-756-46-3
Michalski D.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-0
Olivo R.[6]
Fonio G.
7-56-4
Bertola R.
Mager G.[8]
7-6106-3
Kasnikowski M.
Bailly G.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Mensik J.[4]
5-77-626-4
Caruso S.
Ocleppo J.
6-43-66-0
Ferrari G.
Jianu F.
6-746-46-4
Atmane T.[5]
Casanova H.
7-643-66-1
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[7]
Giustino L.
7-646-2