Varvara Gracheva vs Jaqueline Cristian — Bad Homburg Round of 32

Bad Homburg · WTA · Round of 32
Varvara Gracheva
FRA8
Varvara Gracheva
#95WTA
1810ELO
1641Grass ELO
25 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
grass
Jaqueline Cristian
ROU
Jaqueline Cristian
#36WTA
1834ELO
1529Grass ELO
$742kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Gracheva V.
6-2 6-1
Cristian J.
Gracheva V.
662
Cristian J.
210

Varvara Gracheva defeated Jaqueline Cristian 6-2 6-1 in the Bad Homburg round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jaqueline Cristian came in ranked #36.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gracheva V.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cristian J.

Cristian J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gracheva V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gracheva V.Cristian J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
53%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gracheva V.Cristian J.
Clutch Rating·Even
74
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
84
Break points won·Clear edge
87
71
Deciding sets·Even
90
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
65
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gracheva V.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cristian J.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
6.8+113 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Grass Elo 1529
4.7Overall Elo 1810
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1834
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
27°CClear
Wind 12 km/hHumidity 45%

Draw

Final
Siniakova K.
Bronzetti L.
6-27-65
Semi-finals
Bronzetti L.
Swiatek I.[1]
W/O
Siniakova K.
Navarro E.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Bronzetti L.
Gracheva V.[8]
6-46-3
Navarro E.
Masarova R.
6-721-1
Swiatek I.[1]
Blinkova A.[9]
6-36-2
Siniakova K.
Samsonova L.[2]
7-54-66-2
R16
Siniakova K.
Rodina E.
6-26-4
Masarova R.
Andreescu B.[5]
6-36-2
Samsonova L.[2]
Noskova L.[5]
6-46-746-3
Bronzetti L.
Sherif M.[4]
1-67-626-3
Navarro E.
Cornet A.
7-57-66
Swiatek I.[1]
Teichmann J.
6-36-1
Blinkova A.[9]
Fernandez L.
7-56-2
Gracheva V.[8]
Errani S.
6-27-5
R32
Errani S.
Zanevska M.
6-26-3
Blinkova A.[9]
Lisicki S.
3-66-17-5
Sherif M.[4]
Friedsam A.
4-66-47-5
Bronzetti L.
Grabher J.
6-46-1
Gracheva V.[8]
Cristian J.
6-26-1
Andreescu B.[5]
Kartal S.
6-23-67-5
Masarova R.
Sasnovich A.
6-36-2
Navarro E.
Podoroska N.
6-26-0
Siniakova K.
Cocciaretto E.[7]
6-36-4
Noskova L.[5]
Baindl K.
6-27-5
Rodina E.
Volynets K.
6-06-4
Samsonova L.[2]
Tomova V.
6-16-4
Swiatek I.[1]
Maria T.
5-76-26-0
Teichmann J.
Liu C.
3-66-36-4
Fernandez L.
Rueffer L.
6-06-1
Cornet A.
Trevisan M.
6-46-2