Nerman Fatic vs Federico Coria — Modena CH Quarter-final

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BIH7
Nerman Fatic
#373ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
Federico Coria
ARG1
Federico Coria
#889ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Fatic N.
6-4 2-6 6-3
Coria F.
Fatic N.
6262
Coria F.
4631

Nerman Fatic defeated Federico Coria 6-4 2-6 6-3 in the Modena CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Coria F.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Coria F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Coria F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
67
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
71
Break points won·Dominant
36
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Coria F.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1478
Surface ELO
5.8+37 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1537
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.4
Surface form
3.1
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.9
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Coria F.
Freshness·
—
82

Coria F.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[3]
Droguet T.
6-757-666-4
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Fatic N.[7]
6-33-66-4
Nava E.[3]
Echargui M.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Nava E.[3]
Ferrari G.
6-16-756-2
Fatic N.[7]
Coria F.[1]
6-42-66-3
Droguet T.
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-5
Echargui M.
Atmane T.[5]
7-674-66-2
R16
Droguet T.
Bertola R.
7-626-2
Kasnikowski M.
Travaglia S.
6-27-64
Fatic N.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Caruso S.
6-16-1
Ferrari G.
Olivo R.[6]
6-36-4
Echargui M.
Monteiro T.[2]
3-66-16-2
Atmane T.[5]
Forti F.
6-36-4
Nava E.[3]
Michalski D.
6-26-2
R32
Droguet T.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Gerch L.
7-656-4
Echargui M.
Crawford O.
6-47-5
Forti F.
Serafini M.
6-27-63
Monteiro T.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-726-36-3
Nava E.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-756-46-3
Michalski D.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-0
Olivo R.[6]
Fonio G.
7-56-4
Bertola R.
Mager G.[8]
7-6106-3
Kasnikowski M.
Bailly G.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Mensik J.[4]
5-77-626-4
Caruso S.
Ocleppo J.
6-43-66-0
Ferrari G.
Jianu F.
6-746-46-4
Atmane T.[5]
Casanova H.
7-643-66-1
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[7]
Giustino L.
7-646-2