Salvatore Caruso vs Julian Ocleppo — Modena CH Round of 32

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
ITA
Julian Ocleppo
28 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWWLW
Caruso S.
6-4 3-6 6-0
Ocleppo J.
Caruso S.
6362
Ocleppo J.
4601

Salvatore Caruso defeated Julian Ocleppo 6-4 3-6 6-0 in the Modena CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Ocleppo J.

Ocleppo J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Ocleppo J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
53%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (66 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Ocleppo J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
41
0
Break points saved·Dominant
65
39
Break points won·Clear edge
30
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
14
Tiebreaks·Even
18
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Caruso S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ocleppo J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.3
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[3]
Droguet T.
6-757-666-4
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Fatic N.[7]
6-33-66-4
Nava E.[3]
Echargui M.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Nava E.[3]
Ferrari G.
6-16-756-2
Fatic N.[7]
Coria F.[1]
6-42-66-3
Droguet T.
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-5
Echargui M.
Atmane T.[5]
7-674-66-2
R16
Droguet T.
Bertola R.
7-626-2
Kasnikowski M.
Travaglia S.
6-27-64
Fatic N.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Caruso S.
6-16-1
Ferrari G.
Olivo R.[6]
6-36-4
Echargui M.
Monteiro T.[2]
3-66-16-2
Atmane T.[5]
Forti F.
6-36-4
Nava E.[3]
Michalski D.
6-26-2
R32
Droguet T.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Gerch L.
7-656-4
Echargui M.
Crawford O.
6-47-5
Forti F.
Serafini M.
6-27-63
Monteiro T.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-726-36-3
Nava E.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-756-46-3
Michalski D.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-0
Olivo R.[6]
Fonio G.
7-56-4
Bertola R.
Mager G.[8]
7-6106-3
Kasnikowski M.
Bailly G.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Mensik J.[4]
5-77-626-4
Caruso S.
Ocleppo J.
6-43-66-0
Ferrari G.
Jianu F.
6-746-46-4
Atmane T.[5]
Casanova H.
7-643-66-1
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[7]
Giustino L.
7-646-2