Liam Broady vs Jan Choinski — Eastbourne Round of 32

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 32
Liam Broady
GBR
Liam Broady
#209ATP
1590ELO
1504Grass ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
grass
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#100ATP
1686ELO
1534Grass ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWWW
Broady L.
6-3 6-4
Choinski J.
Broady L.
662
Choinski J.
340

Liam Broady defeated Jan Choinski 6-3 6-4 in the Eastbourne round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #100.

Key context

  • Match story: Liam Broady closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Broady L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Broady L.

Serve advantage — Broady L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Broady L.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Broady L.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Even
59
55
Break points saved·Even
86
90
Break points won·Slight edge
29
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Broady L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Choinski J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5Grass Elo 1504
Surface ELO
3.5+30 Grass Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1590
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1686
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
0.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.3
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Broady L.Choinski J.
Freshness·Even
62
60

Broady L.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 66 games (7d) · Choinski J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo F.[4]
Paul T.[2]
6-41-66-4
Semi-finals
Paul T.[2]
Barrere G.
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[4]
Mcdonald M.
2-67-56-2
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-26-3
Paul T.[2]
Wolf J.
6-44-67-62
Mcdonald M.
Ymer M.
6-43-66-3
Barrere G.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
7-57-62
R16
Cerundolo F.[4]
Huesler M.
7-627-65
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Vukic A.
7-666-4
Zhang Z.
Cressy M.
3-67-56-4
Mcdonald M.
Fritz T.[1]
7-637-68
Ymer M.
Broady L.
6-26-4
Paul T.[2]
Baez S.
6-17-67
Barrere G.
Jarry N.[5]
6-34-66-4
Wolf J.
Van Assche L.
6-26-756-1
R32
Vukic A.
Nakashima B.
6-757-637-65
Ymer M.
Van De Zandschulp B.[9]
3-66-46-2
Huesler M.
Peniston R.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Loffhagen G.
2-67-657-64
Barrere G.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-67-667-64
Broady L.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Baez S.
Borges N.
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Wu Y.
7-647-65
Mcdonald M.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.
Sonego L.[7]
7-646-3
Cressy M.
Galan D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Etcheverry T.[6]
6-26-4