Gregoire Barrere vs Emil Ruusuvuori — Eastbourne Round of 32

Eastbourne · ATP · Round of 32
FRA
Gregoire Barrere
#1288ATP
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
grass
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#786ATP
1606ELO
1576Grass ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Barrere G.
3-6 7-6 7-6
Ruusuvuori E.
Barrere G.
378772
Ruusuvuori E.
666641

Gregoire Barrere defeated Emil Ruusuvuori 3-6 7-6 7-6 in the Eastbourne round of 32 on grass. Gregoire Barrere extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR128clayEmil Ruusuvuori6-2 6-7(7) 5-7 6-1 6-4
2020-02-10RotterdamQ2hardGregoire Barrere7-5 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Barrere G.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Ruusuvuori E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Barrere G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barrere G.Ruusuvuori E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barrere G.Ruusuvuori E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
97
Break points won·Dominant
18
48
Deciding sets·Even
84
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
20
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barrere G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ruusuvuori E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
4.7
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo F.[4]
Paul T.[2]
6-41-66-4
Semi-finals
Paul T.[2]
Barrere G.
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[4]
Mcdonald M.
2-67-56-2
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-26-3
Paul T.[2]
Wolf J.
6-44-67-62
Mcdonald M.
Ymer M.
6-43-66-3
Barrere G.
Kecmanovic M.[8]
7-57-62
R16
Cerundolo F.[4]
Huesler M.
7-627-65
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Vukic A.
7-666-4
Zhang Z.
Cressy M.
3-67-56-4
Mcdonald M.
Fritz T.[1]
7-637-68
Ymer M.
Broady L.
6-26-4
Paul T.[2]
Baez S.
6-17-67
Barrere G.
Jarry N.[5]
6-34-66-4
Wolf J.
Van Assche L.
6-26-756-1
R32
Vukic A.
Nakashima B.
6-757-637-65
Ymer M.
Van De Zandschulp B.[9]
3-66-46-2
Huesler M.
Peniston R.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Loffhagen G.
2-67-657-64
Barrere G.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-67-667-64
Broady L.
Choinski J.
6-36-4
Baez S.
Borges N.
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.[8]
Wu Y.
7-647-65
Mcdonald M.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.
Sonego L.[7]
7-646-3
Cressy M.
Galan D.
6-47-5
Wolf J.
Etcheverry T.[6]
6-26-4