Terence Atmane vs Francesco Forti — Modena CH Round of 16

Modena CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Terence Atmane
FRA5
Terence Atmane
#50ATP
1704ELO
1628Clay ELO
$707kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
Francesco Forti
ITA
Francesco Forti
#380ATP
1399ELO
1372Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWWW
Atmane T.
6-3 6-4
Forti F.
Atmane T.
662
Forti F.
340

Terence Atmane defeated Francesco Forti 6-3 6-4 in the Modena CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Terence Atmane came in ranked #50.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Atmane T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Forti F.

Forti F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Atmane T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Atmane T.Forti F.
48
Serve
—
4
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Atmane T.Forti F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.5
5.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 76). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Atmane T.Forti F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
32
Break points saved·Dominant
95
67
Break points won·Clear edge
25
2
Deciding sets·Even
54
51
Tiebreaks·Dominant
96
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Atmane T.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Forti F.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+256 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Clay Elo 1372
10.0Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1399
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
6.9
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Atmane T.Forti F.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
73

Atmane T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Forti F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 66 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.[3]
Droguet T.
6-757-666-4
Semi-finals
Droguet T.
Fatic N.[7]
6-33-66-4
Nava E.[3]
Echargui M.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Nava E.[3]
Ferrari G.
6-16-756-2
Fatic N.[7]
Coria F.[1]
6-42-66-3
Droguet T.
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-5
Echargui M.
Atmane T.[5]
7-674-66-2
R16
Droguet T.
Bertola R.
7-626-2
Kasnikowski M.
Travaglia S.
6-27-64
Fatic N.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Caruso S.
6-16-1
Ferrari G.
Olivo R.[6]
6-36-4
Echargui M.
Monteiro T.[2]
3-66-16-2
Atmane T.[5]
Forti F.
6-36-4
Nava E.[3]
Michalski D.
6-26-2
R32
Droguet T.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-46-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Gerch L.
7-656-4
Echargui M.
Crawford O.
6-47-5
Forti F.
Serafini M.
6-27-63
Monteiro T.[2]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-726-36-3
Nava E.[3]
Ejupovic E.
6-756-46-3
Michalski D.
Kachmazov A.
6-46-0
Olivo R.[6]
Fonio G.
7-56-4
Bertola R.
Mager G.[8]
7-6106-3
Kasnikowski M.
Bailly G.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.
Mensik J.[4]
5-77-626-4
Caruso S.
Ocleppo J.
6-43-66-0
Ferrari G.
Jianu F.
6-746-46-4
Atmane T.[5]
Casanova H.
7-643-66-1
Coria F.[1]
Houkes M.
6-46-2
Fatic N.[7]
Giustino L.
7-646-2