Benjamin Lock vs Mateus Alves — Medellin CH Round of 16

Medellin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ZIM
Benjamin Lock
33 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 June 2023
clay
BRA
Mateus Alves
#456ATP
1245ELO
1247Clay ELO
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
Lock B.
7-6 4-6 6-1
Alves M.
Lock B.
77462
Alves M.
65611

Benjamin Lock defeated Mateus Alves 7-6 4-6 6-1 in the Medellin CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Benjamin Lock came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lock B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Alves M.

Alves M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lock B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lock B.Alves M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 152). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lock B.Alves M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
0
7
Break points saved·Dominant
46
77
Break points won·Slight edge
0
10
Deciding sets·Even
3
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lock B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Alves M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[7]
Lock B.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kypson P.[7]
Ribeiro E.
6-47-64
Lock B.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Kypson P.[7]
Soto M.
6-36-2
Soriano Barrera A.
Mejia N.
1-67-656-2
Lock B.
Serdarusic N.[6]
6-46-4
Ribeiro E.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
6-34-66-2
R16
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Luz O.
7-636-3
Serdarusic N.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
7-56-4
Mejia N.
Puttergill C.
6-46-3
Soto M.
Heide G.
6-33-66-1
Ribeiro E.
Melzer G.
6-36-4
Soriano Barrera A.
Mccormick T.
7-656-747-65
Soriano Barrera A.
Mccormick T.
7-656-747-65
Kypson P.[7]
Lama G.
7-676-1
Lock B.
Alves M.
7-654-66-1
R32
Ribeiro E.
Schoolkate T.[8]
6-27-64
Heide G.
Delbonis F.[3]
7-56-4
Lama G.
Barrena A.
6-736-46-4
Serdarusic N.[6]
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Panta Herreros J.
Sakamoto P.
6-46-2
Alves M.
Santamaria F.
6-46-4
Puttergill C.
Monzon I.
6-37-63
Mejia N.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-27-63
Soriano Barrera A.
Zanellato N.
7-636-2
Lock B.
Reis Da Silva J.[4]
6-36-1
Kypson P.[7]
Franco Descotte M.
6-46-3
Mccormick T.
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-736-17-65
Soto M.
Rehberg M.
7-651-66-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Mayo A.
7-656-3
Luz O.
Rodriguez Rodriguez J.
6-36-3
Melzer G.
Statham J.
1-66-47-60
Mccormick T.
Andreozzi G.
6-736-17-65