Carlos Taberner vs Kacper Zuk — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
clay
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
Taberner C.
6-4 7-6
Zuk K.
Taberner C.
6772
Zuk K.
4630

Carlos Taberner defeated Kacper Zuk 6-4 7-6 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Zuk K.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Zuk K.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
5.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Zuk K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
18
Break points saved·Even
74
76
Break points won·Dominant
59
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
25
Tiebreaks·Even
22
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 112 days (−1.5)
Zuk K.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.9
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Navone M.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Navone M.
Stodder T.
6-26-0
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Kolar Z.
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Blanch U.
6-35-77-5
Stodder T.
Michalski D.
6-16-4
Kolar Z.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
6-36-1
Navone M.
Guinard M.
7-56-736-2
R16
Kolar Z.
Taberner C.
6-46-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-626-3
Blanch U.
Blanch D.
1-66-36-4
Guinard M.
Kym J.
6-36-4
Stodder T.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-43-66-0
Michalski D.
Molleker R.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Kasnikowski M.
6-47-64
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Nagal S.
6-12-66-4
R32
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Mensik J.
7-683-67-611
Blanch U.
Sachko V.
7-650-0
Guinard M.
Blancaneaux G.[6]
6-24-3
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Houkes M.
6-17-62
Stodder T.
Jorda Sanchis D.
7-626-3
Martin Tiffon P.
Svrcina D.[8]
7-57-64
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
3-66-36-1
Molleker R.
Machac T.[3]
7-57-61
Kolar Z.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Giustino L.
3-66-26-4
Blanch D.
Shevchenko A.[1]
6-36-2
Taberner C.
Zuk K.
6-47-63
Nagal S.
Borg L.
6-26-3
Kym J.
Oberleitner N.
6-16-2
Michalski D.
Valkusz M.
5-76-46-1
Kasnikowski M.
Laaksonen H.
6-12-67-64