Albert Ramos vs Fernando Verdasco — Montechiarugolo CH Round of 32

Montechiarugolo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
clay
ESP
Fernando Verdasco
42 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Ramos A.
6-2 6-3
Verdasco F.
Ramos A.
662
Verdasco F.
230

Albert Ramos defeated Fernando Verdasco 6-2 6-3 in the Montechiarugolo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 6–5. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 7–5.

Key context

Head to head

6–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-25EstorilQFclayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-2
2021-04-26EstorilR32clayAlbert Ramos6-3 6-3
2019-07-22GstaadR16clayAlbert Ramos6-4 7-6(4)
2019-07-15BastadR16clayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-4
2017-07-17BastadQFclayFernando Verdasco6-3 6-2
2016-08-15Cincinnati MastersR64hardFernando Verdasco7-6(5) 6-4
2016-07-11BastadFclayAlbert Ramos6-3 6-4
2014-07-07BastadR16clayFernando Verdasco6-1 7-5
2013-06-17EastbourneR16grassFernando Verdasco6-4 6-0
2012-08-27US OpenR64hardFernando Verdasco7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4
2012-02-13Sao PauloQFclayAlbert Ramos7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Verdasco F.

Verdasco F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Ramos A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Verdasco F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Verdasco F.
Clutch Rating·Even
59
57
Break points saved·Even
95
96
Break points won·Slight edge
49
40
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Verdasco F.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.9
Surface form
2.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Muller A.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Maestrelli F.
Zeppieri G.[6]
6-46-747-62
Muller A.[3]
Travaglia S.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Monteiro T.[2]
6-37-65
Muller A.[3]
Giannessi A.
3-66-36-1
Maestrelli F.
Collarini A.
6-46-0
Zeppieri G.[6]
Ramos A.[1]
7-56-3
R16
Maestrelli F.
Napolitano S.
7-636-3
Travaglia S.
Gigante M.
6-47-62
Zeppieri G.[6]
Bonadio R.
6-27-5
Monteiro T.[2]
Rola B.
6-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Gaio F.
7-56-2
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-2
Collarini A.
Caruso S.
7-56-4
Ramos A.[1]
Fonio G.
6-13-66-3
R32
Travaglia S.
Lavagno E.
6-20-0
Gaio F.
Forti F.
7-647-62
Monteiro T.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-46-4
Bonadio R.
Darderi L.
7-636-4
Collarini A.
Popko D.
6-46-3
Muller A.[3]
Marti Pujolras A.
6-46-3
Zeppieri G.[6]
Bobrov B.
6-46-3
Napolitano S.
Cuevas P.
4-66-36-1
Fonio G.
Moroni F.
6-36-2
Giannessi A.
Janvier M.
6-44-66-1
Rola B.
Weis A.
6-31-66-3
Gigante M.
Kovalik J.[8]
6-47-65
Roca Batalla O.
Andreev A.
6-16-4
Caruso S.
Passaro F.[7]
6-44-67-5
Maestrelli F.
Munar J.[4]
7-56-3
Ramos A.[1]
Verdasco F.
6-26-3