Lin Zhu vs Rebecca Marino — Birmingham Quarter-final

Birmingham · WTA · Quarter-final
Lin Zhu
CHN
Lin Zhu
#142WTA
1674ELO
1545Grass ELO
32 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
CAN
Rebecca Marino
#387WTA
1626ELO
1571Grass ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Zhu L.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Marino R.
Zhu L.
4662
Marino R.
6321

Lin Zhu defeated Rebecca Marino 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Birmingham quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Lin Zhu came in ranked #142, leading the head-to-head 2–1. Lin Zhu extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-24MadridR128clayRebecca Marino7-6(1) 6-4
2023-02-27MonterreyR16hardLin Zhu7-6(4) 2-6 6-3
2023-01-16Australian OpenR128hardLin Zhu6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Zhu L.serving85% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Marino R.

Marino R.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zhu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhu L.Marino R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
40%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhu L.Marino R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
37
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
81
Break points won·Dominant
91
28
Deciding sets·Clear edge
15
33
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
65
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhu L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Marino R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Grass Elo 1545
Surface ELO
5.5+25 Grass Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1674
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1626
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
9.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zhu L.Marino R.
Freshness·
100
—

Zhu L.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3