Rebecca Marino vs Xiyu Wang — Birmingham Round of 32

Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
CAN
Rebecca Marino
#387WTA
1626ELO
1571Grass ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
grass
Xiyu Wang
CHN
Xiyu Wang
#86WTA
1772ELO
1583Grass ELO
25 yrs · 182 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Marino R.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Wang X.
Marino R.
77562
Wang X.
65731

Rebecca Marino defeated Xiyu Wang 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Xiyu Wang came in ranked #86, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Rebecca Marino claimed a first win over Xiyu Wang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Rebecca Marino closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-26EastbourneR32grassXiyu Wang6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Marino R.serving82% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Wang X.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Marino R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marino R.Wang X.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 161). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marino R.Wang X.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
63
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
87
Break points won·Dominant
28
91
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marino R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Wang X.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.1Grass Elo 1571
Surface ELO
4.9+12 Grass Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1626
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1772
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Marino R.Wang X.
Freshness·
—
95

Wang X.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ostapenko J.[2]
Krejcikova B.[1]
7-686-4
Semi-finals
Krejcikova B.[1]
Zhu L.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[2]
Potapova A.[4]
5-76-26-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu L.
Marino R.
4-66-36-2
Krejcikova B.[1]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-36-2
Potapova A.[4]
Dart H.
4-66-36-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Frech M.
4-67-56-2
R16
Fruhvirtova L.
Pera B.[6]
6-17-63
Marino R.
Bektas E.
6-44-67-61
Krejcikova B.[1]
Martincova T.
6-46-4
Dart H.
Kalinina A.[5]
6-33-66-1
Zhu L.
Linette M.[3]
6-36-0
Potapova A.[4]
Mcnally C.
3-66-27-60
Frech M.
Cirstea S.[8]
6-36-716-4
Ostapenko J.[2]
Williams V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Mcnally C.
Davis L.
6-17-5
Zhu L.
Boulter K.
7-57-5
Potapova A.[4]
Kostyuk M.
6-767-56-4
Pera B.[6]
Bouzkova M.
6-47-63
Krejcikova B.[1]
Bucsa C.
6-36-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Svitolina E.
6-26-0
Marino R.
Wang X.
7-655-76-3
Bektas E.
Zhang S.[7]
6-46-3
Kalinina A.[5]
Parks A.
6-46-4
Frech M.
Strycova B.
7-636-1
Ostapenko J.[2]
Noskova L.
6-25-76-1
Dart H.
Burrage J.
4-66-27-5
Cirstea S.[8]
Bogdan A.
6-42-66-3
Williams V.
Giorgi C.
7-654-67-66
Linette M.[3]
Paolini J.
3-67-56-4
Martincova T.
Tomova V.
6-16-3