Jerome Kym vs Emilio Nava — Poznan CH Qualifying Round 2

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
SUI9
Jerome Kym
#186ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 June 2023
clay
Emilio Nava
USA1
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Kym J.
6-3 7-6
Nava E.
Kym J.
6772
Nava E.
3620

Jerome Kym defeated Emilio Nava 6-3 7-6 in the Poznan CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Jerome Kym closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve advantage — Kym J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Kym J.Nava E.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Even
7.8
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (122 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
52
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Even
21
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1529
Surface ELO
6.1+157 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.7
Minutes 14d
8.2
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Nava E.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Kym J.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Kym J.[9]
Nava E.[1]
6-37-62
Blanch U.[12]
Sanchez Jover C.[6]
6-30-66-4
Jorda Sanchis D.[11]
Gima S.
6-26-4
Guinard M.[7]
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
6-37-5
Molleker R.[2]
Wehnelt K.
6-46-4
Oberleitner N.
Taberner C.[3]
6-17-5
Q1
Sanchez Jover C.[6]
Damas M.
7-50-67-66
Nava E.[1]
Pichler D.
7-634-66-2
Gima S.
Strombachs R.[4]
6-37-5
Oberleitner N.
Purtseladze S.[10]
6-46-0
Guinard M.[7]
Zgola B.
6-06-2
Taberner C.[3]
Berkieta T.
3-66-37-64
Wehnelt K.
Ivanovski K.[8]
6-33-66-3
Blanch U.[12]
Te R.
7-617-5
Barranco Cosano J.[5]
Domingues J.
6-46-1
Kym J.[9]
Nouza P.
7-57-610